MedPath

Safety, Efficacy and Cost-efficacy of Ranibizumab (Monotherapy or Combination With Laser) in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema
Interventions
Procedure: Laser
Registration Number
NCT01135914
Lead Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Brief Summary

To evaluate, specifically within the Canadian medical environment, the efficacy, safety and cost-efficacy of ranibizumab administered either as combination therapy (ranibizumab plus laser photocoagulation), or as monotherapy in comparison with the current standard of care (laser photocoagulation monotherapy), in patients with visual impairment due to DME.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
241
Inclusion Criteria
  • Stable Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Visual impairment due to focal or diffuse DME in at least one eye
Exclusion Criteria
  • Active conditions in the study eye that could prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment
  • Active eye infection or inflammation
  • History of stroke, renal failure or uncontrolled hypertension

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Combination TherapyLaserParticipants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments
Laser MonotherapyLaserParticipants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only
Combination TherapyranibizumabParticipants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments
Ranibizumab MonotherapyranibizumabParticipants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12Baseline and 12 months

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineBaseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response.

Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 1212 month

(TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision.

Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment

Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA12 months

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement.

National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 1212 month

The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed

EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 1212 month

The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1="no problems", 2="some problems" and 3="extreme problems". Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health).

Trial Locations

Locations (20)

Memorial University Health Sciences Centre / Newfoundland Drive Medical Clinic

🇨🇦

St-John's, Canada

Dr.Michel Giunta Clinique Médicale

🇨🇦

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Saskatoon City Hospital / Spadina Clinic

🇨🇦

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Institut de l'oeil des Laurentides

🇨🇦

Quebec, Canada

Calgary Retina Consultants

🇨🇦

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

UBC - Eye Care Center

🇨🇦

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Retina Consultants of Victoria

🇨🇦

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Victoria General Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology

🇨🇦

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Canadian Centre for Advanced Eye Therapeutics

🇨🇦

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus

🇨🇦

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Toronto Western Hospital

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Clinique ChirurgiVision

🇨🇦

Drummondville, Quebec, Canada

Hôpital Notre Dame (CHUM)

🇨🇦

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

🇨🇦

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Royal Victoria Hospital

🇨🇦

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Centre Oculaire de Québec

🇨🇦

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Ivey Eye Institute

🇨🇦

London, Ontario, Canada

St-Michael's Hospital - Dept of Ophthalmology

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Memorial University Health Sciences Centre / Bense Eye Centre

🇨🇦

St-John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath