Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06328855
NCT06328855UnknownNot Applicable

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs. Nasogastric Tube Feeding on Dysphagia Patients After Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Copka Sonpashan0 sites80 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
80
Primary Endpoint
Penetration-Aspiration Scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding and nasogastric tube feeding, respectively. Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.

Detailed Description

Dysphagia in patients after stroke continues to be a challenge. To avoid the wound caused by gastrostomy, nasogastric tube feeding has been the mainstay of palliation, but potential side effects exist this choice. Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding is an established modality that can be used with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. This study reports the outcomes of Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding and comparison with nasogastric tube feeding, including nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life, depression, and follow-up in patients receiving comprehensive rehabilitation therapy.This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding and nasogastric tube feeding, respectively. Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
  • any degree of dysphagia at admission;
  • steady vital signs, without severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia, able to cooperate with the assessment.
  • transferred out within three weeks of hospitalization in the neurology department.

Exclusion Criteria

  • complicated with other neurological diseases;
  • damaged mucosa or incomplete structure in nasopharynx;
  • tracheostomy tube plugged;
  • unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
  • simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.

Arms & Interventions

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding+comprehensive rehabilitation therapy

Experimental

Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding.

Intervention: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding (Device)

comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Active Comparator

Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Nasogastric Tube Feeding.

Intervention: Nasogastric Tube Feeding (Device)

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding+comprehensive rehabilitation therapy

Experimental

Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding.

Intervention: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy (Behavioral)

comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Active Comparator

Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Nasogastric Tube Feeding.

Intervention: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Penetration-Aspiration Scale

Time Frame: day 1 and day 15

Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to assess dysphagia under Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study, primarily evaluating the extent to which fluid food entered the airway and caused penetration or aspiration during the swallowing process. The scores ranged 1 point to 8 points. As the level increased, the severity of dysphagia also increased.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Nutritional status-total protein(day 1 and day 15)
  • Body weight(day 1 and day 15)
  • Nutritional status-albumin(day 1 and day 15)
  • Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale(day 1 and day 15)
  • Patient health questionnaire-9(day 1 and day 15)
  • Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire(day 1 and day 15)

Investigators

Sponsor
Copka Sonpashan
Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Copka Sonpashan

The Research Director

Chao Phya Abhaibhubejhr Hospital

Similar Trials