Lung Cancer Screening: A Multilevel Intervention
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 66
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Knowledge of lung cancer screening
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The study will develop and test the feasibility of the Lung Cancer Assessment of Risk and Education (LungCARE) intervention to increase discussions about lung cancer screening between patients and physicians. This intervention will be designed to reach primary care patients and will be implemented at three levels of the healthcare structure: patient, physician, and system. The patient component includes a short lung cancer screening video and questions regarding screening preferences. Patients will receive immediate feedback in a report (patient report) that summarizes their lung cancer screening preferences and a handout summarizing the educational video. At the physician level, primary care physicians (PCPs) will receive a similar report (physician report), which will be delivered to them prior to the patient visit. The report contains additional information about documenting discussion related to risk, screening, and referrals in the electronic health record (EHR) system (system component). The investigators will develop the LungCARE intervention and have a comparison group that will receive usual care. Preliminary testing of LungCARE will occur via a randomized controlled trial (RCT) at the University of California, San Francisco, General Internal Medicine and Women's Health Primary Care clinics. The RCT will evaluate LungCARE among 50 PCPs and 120 high-risk current and former smoker patients. The investigators will determine whether the intervention is accepted by patients and physicians and whether patients who received LungCARE are more likely to discuss lung cancer screening with their physicians when compared to patients and physicians in the comparison group. The investigators will also determine whether the intervention affects knowledge of lung cancer and low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, perception of risk, and worry about lung cancer in patients when compared to patients in the comparison group. The investigators expect their research to provide specific recommendations that will facilitate patient-physician discussions about LDCT screening and promote shared decision-making among patients and physicians.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Screening
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 55 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •age 55-80
- •smoked at least 30 pack-years in lifetime
- •if former smoker, quit smoking within the last 15 years
- •English speaker
- •no prior history of lung cancer
- •did not have a lung cancer screening test within the last year
- •PCP does not object to patient's participation
- •have a scheduled visit at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) internal medicine clinics.
Exclusion Criteria
- •speaking a language other than English
- •has a history of lung cancer
- •had a lung cancer screening test within the last year
- •PCP objects to patient's participation.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Knowledge of lung cancer screening
Time Frame: Over one week
Outcome 2 will be assessed in the follow-up survey, administered within one week following the clinic visit. All patients will answer true/false questions addressing various screening topics (e.g. annual lung cancer screening, false negative scans, false positive scans, who should be screened, and radiation exposure). Correct answers will be given a score of 1 and incorrect answers will be given a score of 0. Responses for each question will be added up to a single score, ranging between 0 and 10. Lower scores indicate lower knowledge and higher scores indicate higher knowledge.
Discussion of lung cancer risk and LDCT screening with PCP
Time Frame: Over 3 months
Outcome 1 will be assessed in the follow-up survey, administered within one week following the clinic visit. All patients will answer the following yes/no questions: "During your PCP visit, did you discuss...your personal risk of getting lung cancer/the risks and benefits of screening/how often people should be screened/whether you should be screened?", "Did you discuss smoking cigarettes?", "Did you talk about smoking and the risk of lung cancer?", and "Did your doctor refer you to or order a test for lung cancer screening?" Each question will be looked at individually and summed into a single score (0-7). Higher scores indicate an increased discussion of lung cancer risk and LDCT screening. Three months following the clinic visit, the investigators will review the electronic health records for all patients who signed HIPAA forms. Investigators will gather information about discussion of lung cancer risk and documentation, referrals, counseling, and receipt of LDCT screening.
Perception of lung cancer risk
Time Frame: Over one week
Outcome 3 will be measured using an adapted Lerman Cancer Worry Scale. The following question will be asked over the course of one week, both prior to and following the clinic visit: "In your opinion, compared to most people of your same age, sex, and race, what are you chances of getting lung cancer someday?" Participants will use a five-point Likert scale ("much higher" \[1\], "higher" \[2\], "about the same" \[3\], "lower" \[4\], "much lower" \[5\]) to answer the questions. A higher score indicates a lower perception of lung cancer risk. Responses will be compared between the baseline and follow-up surveys.
Secondary Outcomes
- Worry about lung cancer(Over one week)