Biomechanical Effects of Digitally Constructed Subperiosteal Implants
- Conditions
- Bone Loss
- Interventions
- Other: Subperiosteal implant framework
- Registration Number
- NCT06362057
- Lead Sponsor
- Menoufia University
- Brief Summary
Subperiosteal implants were first introduced in 1940 and then used worldwide for the treatment of edentulous maxilla or mandible with advanced bone atrophy.
- Detailed Description
With the advancement of digital technology for the fabrication of materials and the emerging of new materials, subperiosteal implants can be fabricated from a wide variety of materials, and there is a lack of evidence regarding which material could be suitable.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 9
- A 3D image of an edentulous maxilla bone derived from a computed tomography scan of an adult patient.
- Maxilla with Cawood and Howell class 4 or 5 classification
- A 2D image of an edentulous maxilla bone
- A non atrophied maxilla
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PEKK framework group Subperiosteal implant framework Virtual design for PEKK subperiosteal framework group on atrophied maxilla. PEEK framework group Subperiosteal implant framework Virtual design for PEEK subperiosteal framework group on atrophied maxilla. Titanium framework group Subperiosteal implant framework Virtual design for Titanium subperiosteal framework group on atrophied maxilla.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method bone loss under the implants 10-15 years amount of bone loss which appears on a modeling process, The modeling process will be completed using a three-dimensional modeling software. A three-dimensional mesh consisting of 556,365 nodes and 2972,897 elements with VRMesh Studio (VirtualGrid Inc, Bellevue City, WA, USA) will used in the program.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mohammed A. El-Sawy
🇪🇬Mansoura, Egypt