Comparative study between the video laryngoscope manufactured by printer and the traditional model in Tracheal Intubatio

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Airway Management; Intubation; E03.155.197

• Registration Number: RBR-9t36r35
• Lead Sponsor: Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2023-03-24
• Study Completion: 2023-05-15
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ot yet recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Patients of both genders; over 18 years old and under 70 years old; candidates for surgeries under general anesthesia and in need of tracheal intubation; with risk classification by the American Society of Anesthesiology

Exclusion Criteria

Urgent/emergency surgeries; upper airway surgeries; head and neck surgeries; orthognathic surgeries; surgeries with planned nasotracheal intubation; previous surgeries on the cervical spine; patients with a body mass index greater than 35; patients with cervical disc injury; with spine fractures; patients using a cervical collar; patients with head and neck injuries that preclude the use of standard intubation techniques; patients with type I diabetes; syndromic patients

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Decrease of two points in the intubation difficulty scale, with the use of the 3D video laryngoscope

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To check for differences, comparing 3D videolaryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope, in intubation time and intubation effectiveness;To comparing the 3D videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope regarding compound adverse effects during intubation