MedPath

Diagnostic Utility of Otosight Middle Ear Scope

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Otitis Media
Middle Ear Infection
Ear Infection
Interventions
Device: The OtoSight Middle Ear Scope
Registration Number
NCT05641285
Lead Sponsor
Baylor College of Medicine
Brief Summary

Evaluate clinic workflow impact of OtoSight use for patients seen in the pediatric otolaryngology clinic.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the successful exam completion rate, the detection of middle ear fluid (versus no fluid), and the categorization of middle ear fluid (purulent vs. serous vs mucoid,) of routine otoscopy examination versus otosight examination versus tympanogram.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
165
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients aged 6 months to 12 years old who are seen in the outpatient Otolaryngology clinic at Texas Children's Hospital main and west campuses.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who have a history of ear tube placement
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Otosight, Otoscope, and TympanogramThe OtoSight Middle Ear ScopeProspective study using a convenience sample. There will be no group assignment or randomization. There is no intervention planned and therefore, no placebo group or use of controls.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Detection of middle ear fluid6 months

Compare the detection of middle ear fluid (versus no fluid) of these diagnostic tools.

Categorization of middle ear fluid6 months

Compare the categorization of middle ear fluid (purulent vs. serous vs mucoid) of these diagnostic tools.

Exam Completion Rate6 months

Compare the successful exam completion rate of these three diagnostic tools.

For the Otosight device: presence or absence of visible tympanic membrane, and presence or absence of graph indicating fluid/no fluid in the middle ear.

For tympanogram: presence or absence of interpretable tracing indicating normal tympanic membrane movement, retracted tympanic membrane, or no movement of tympanic membrane.

For the Otoscope: success is visualization of the tympanic membrane versus unable to see tympanic membrane.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Timed Evaluation of Clinic Flow6 months

Evaluate clinic workflow impact of OtoSight use for patients seen in the pediatric otolaryngology clinic by timing how long it takes for the MA and/or MD to complete the Otosight exam.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Texas Children's Hospital

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath