MedPath

Symptom Management in Patients on Dialysis

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
End-stage Kidney Disease
Interventions
Other: SUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information Hub
Other: SUPPORT-DIALYSIS Only
Registration Number
NCT05515991
Lead Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Brief Summary

This is a parallel arm, pilot study used to examine the feasibility of electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for symptom assessment and monitoring as well as a linked self-management support and decision support information hub (https://symptomcare.org) to facilitate symptom management for patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Two dialysis centers will be included in the study, with one center receiving SUPPORT-Dialysis (intervention arm) and the other receiving standard care (control arm).

Detailed Description

In Canada, 20,000-25,000 patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) experience a range of symptoms such as chronic pain, itchiness, fatigue, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbances \[1-5\]. These may impact quality of life, increase mortality, decrease treatment adherence, and increased hospitalizations \[6-8\]. These symptoms are under-managed and under-recognized among these patients, but screening and managing symptoms using patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) may be a useful and inexpensive solution. PROMS have previously been used successfully in cancer care \[8-9\], and have potential for clinical care of patients with kidney failure as well.

Electronic collection of PROMs (ePROMs) facilitates PROMs use by allowing linkage to electronic patient records \[10-11\] and immediate scoring and presentation of results to patients and clinicians \[12-14\]. ePROMs allow the use of computer adaptive testing (CAT) to personalize questions, increase the precision of measurements and reduce survey burden \[15-17\]. The investigators also developed a self-management support and decision support resource hub(https://symptomcare.org) to help dialysis patients and their clinical team in identifying and managing relevant physical and psychological symptoms that require further assessment and potential intervention.

Patients will complete Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) CAT surveys on an electronic data capture system (SUPPORT-Dialysis) every four weeks during their dialysis treatment for six months. In the intervention, patients with moderate/severe symptoms will be flagged for the clinical team. Moderate/severe symptoms will be determined based on whether the participants score above a pre-defined cut-off in the surveys. The participant, primary nurse, and nephrologist will also receive an output report and be given access to https://symptomcare.org for suggested symptom management actions.

To establish the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, the investigators will assess

1. Recruitment Rate

2. Retention and Completion rate

3. Acceptability

4. Patient satisfaction

5. Staff satisfaction

Based on the objectives of this study, the investigators hypothesize the following:

1. Recruitment goals will be met; \>50% of approached patients will consent; completion rate will be \> 80% of participants at least 50% of the time, and dropout rate will be \< 30%.

2. \>80% of patients find the toolkit acceptable; \<20% of staff find the process intrusive to workflow.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with severe acute illness or condition that hampers questionnaire completion assessed by clinical team.
  • Dementia indicated in the medical record, indicated by the managing healthcare team.
  • Unable to understand English - as assessed by clinical team.
  • Life expectancy < 6 months as assessed by main responsible nephrologist.
  • Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
SUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information HubSUPPORT-DIALYSIS with Access to Output Report and Information HubFeasibility of SUPPORT-Dialysis at Toronto General Hospital
SUPPORT-DIALYSIS OnlySUPPORT-DIALYSIS OnlyUsual Treatment at Humber River Hospital
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of Eligible Patients who decline consentBaseline

Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if decline rate is \<50% for eligible patients.

Proportion of Participants who miss or refuse ePROMs follow-upsBaseline to follow-up (6 months)

Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if \<30% of participants complete \<50% of all follow-up visits.

Recruitment TargetBaseline

Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if recruitment target of 30 participants at each site are obtained in a 3-month period of the pilot.

Proportion of Enrolled Patients who Drop-Out From the StudyBaseline to follow-up (6 months)

Feasibility of toolkit will be confirmed if the dropout rate is \< 30%.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient AcceptabilityFollow-up (every 4 weeks, up to 6 months)

Proportion of patients who find the tool 1) acceptable, 2) not burdensome and 3) important, based on responses to the "Patient Satisfaction Survey" they will complete.

Clinical Team AcceptabilityFollow-up (every 4 weeks, up to 6 months)

Proportion of staff who do not find the use of the tool intrusive to the workflow, based on responses to the "Staff Satisfaction Survey" they will complete.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Etobicoke General Hospital

🇨🇦

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Toronto General Hospital

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath