Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04844437
NCT04844437Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Intrapartum Translabial Ultrasonography Reliability in Comparison With Traditional Digital Examination

Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: February 20, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Acuracy of the fetal head progression distance

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In a present study vaginal examination of the fetal head station is compared with transperineal ultrasonography evaluation of fetal head station and the ability of ultrasonography evaluation in predicting the time and mode of delivery will be investigated.

Detailed Description

The sonographically measured head station, 'ITU station', was measured along the longest visible axis of the fetal head, between the intersections with the infra pubic line and the deepest bony part of the fetal head, subtracting 3 cm for the level of the ischial spines. This parameter is useful to determine the level of engagement of the fetal head and its progression throughout labor.

The labor is divided into a latent phase (stage 0), an active phase (stage 1 and 2), and a third stage defined as the time period between the delivery of the baby and the delivery of the placenta. According to the classic definition, the onset of labor is when regular contractions have been established. The latent phase is characterized by painful contractions and cervical dilatation up to 5 cm in accordance with WHO.

The fetal descent in the birth canal is assessed by vaginal digital examinations and related to the ischial spine. ACOG has defined five stations above (-5) and below (+5) the level of the spine (0 stations). Minus five corresponds to the pelvic inlet, zero to the level of the ischial spine, and plus four corresponds to the pelvic floor.

Traditionally, labor progression has been assessed by digital examination of cervical dilatation and fetal descent. Recent studies, however, dispute these findings and found the clinical examination of fetal descent and position to be unprecise and subjective with a high interobserver variation. Dupuis et al. made an important contribution to this debate when he rigorously assessed the accuracy of station diagnosis with digital examinations. . This study provides evidence that digital assessment of fetal head station is unreliable.

However, a study from 2019 found a good correlation between clinical assessments and ultrasound examinations when only one experienced clinician and one trained ultrasound examiner compared their results.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Control
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • At or over 36 weeks pregnant women
  • Pregnant women at the active phase of the first stage of labor
  • Pregnant women at the second stage of labor

Exclusion Criteria

  • Breech presentation
  • Fetal anomaly
  • In utero ex fetus cases
  • Trial of labor after cesarean cases
  • Pregnant women at the latent phase of the first sage of labor

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Acuracy of the fetal head progression distance

Time Frame: At any time in active phase of first stage or second stage of labor

Transperineal measurement of fetal head station will be compared with vaginal examination of fetal head descent and these two measurements correlated with delivery outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

  • Interobserver agreement between vaginal examination fetal head station(At any time in active phase of first stage or second stage of labor)
  • Interobserver agreement between ultrasonographic fetal head station measurement(At any time in active phase of first stage or second stage of labor)

Investigators

Sponsor
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Arzu Bilge Tekin

Specialist

Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials