Effects Of Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Upper Limb Loading Exercises on Grip Strength,Dexterity and Function in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Modified Action Research Arm Test
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study is conducted to assess the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation Vs limb loading exercises on hand grip strength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute cervical spinal cord injury.
Detailed Description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is based on the concept that rehabilitative training recruits neuronal systems spinal cord injury that remain intact after the injury to take over the impaired function.Working in the field of rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured, presents many challenges. Every patient presents a new and specific challenge. The tetraplegics more so than the paraplegics as the result of loss of active function of their upper extremities in addition to loss of function in the trunk and lower extremities. This study will be conducted to assess the effects of functional electrical stimulation versus limb loading exercises on hand grip strength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. trength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. The study will be randomized clinical trial. Participants will be randomly allocated in to two groups each group will have ten participants.. This study will be conducted in two Hospitals in Punjab pakistan. The group A Will receive functional electrical stimulation .The group B will receive upper limb loading exercises .Both groups will be given 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks. The outcomes will be measured before and after giving treatment by using modified Action Research Arm Test (ARAT),Hand held dynamometry , Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). The results will be calculated by using SPSS 23 version . Statistical tests will be applied according to the normality of the data either it will be parametric or non-parametric.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with incomplete SCI at neurological level C5-T1 in subacute stage.
- •Medically stable
- •Able to tolerate the Functional Electrical stimulation without sustained autonomic dysreflexia
- •A score greater than 16 in mini-mental test
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients taking long term steroids
- •patient having pre-existing injury on upper limb or hand
- •Patients have had Previous participation in experimental trial for spinal cord injury
- •Patients using Currently cardioactive medications
- •Individuals who has had Tendon transfers, implanted devices bladder stimulation, chronic intrathecal infusions
- •Individuals with Bleeding disorders.
- •Amputation of any digit on target hand
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Modified Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: 8th week
The ARAT has excellent reliability and low ceiling effects. It consists of 4 subtests, including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. All tasks were scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where 0 reflects poor hand function and 3 reflects good hand function (maximum score, 57).
Hand Held Dynamometry
Time Frame: 8th week
A small portable device is held by the examiner and placed against the patient's limb .during a maximal isometric contraction. The device can be used to test hand muscle strength efficiently
9 peg hole test
Time Frame: 8th week
Nine-Hole Peg Test is administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into holes on the board as quickly as possible. Participants must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container.. The number of seconds it takes for the patient to complete the test.