A Review and Comparison of Cryoablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in Children
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. It is also to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another and to describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA.
详细描述
Cryotherapy (Cryo) is a new ablation energy source used instead of the radiofrequency (RFA) method for ablation of septal pathways. In the past year, we have used cryo approximately 50 times, however 50% of the cryo procedures crossed over from RFA to cryo or cryo to RFA. It appears to me that cryo use should be as an adjunct therapy to RFA instead of replacement of RFA.
I would like to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. I would like to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another. I would also describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA. All of this can be done with a chart review.
This will be done through a retrospective study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Defined Population
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •charts between January 1 and 2004 to December 31, 2004
- •pediatric population
- •those who were ablated
排除标准
- 未提供
