跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00238823
NCT00238823终止不适用

A Review and Comparison of Cryoablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in Children

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2004年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
50
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. It is also to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another and to describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA.

详细描述

Cryotherapy (Cryo) is a new ablation energy source used instead of the radiofrequency (RFA) method for ablation of septal pathways. In the past year, we have used cryo approximately 50 times, however 50% of the cryo procedures crossed over from RFA to cryo or cryo to RFA. It appears to me that cryo use should be as an adjunct therapy to RFA instead of replacement of RFA.

I would like to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. I would like to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another. I would also describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA. All of this can be done with a chart review.

This will be done through a retrospective study.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Defined Population
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • charts between January 1 and 2004 to December 31, 2004
  • pediatric population
  • those who were ablated

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验