Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for SUI During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary IncontinencePelvic Floor Disorders
- Interventions
- Device: SISDevice: RP Sling
- Registration Number
- NCT04586166
- Lead Sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Brief Summary
SASS (Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for SUI During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy) will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind non-inferiority trial.
- Detailed Description
SASS aims to compare the efficacy of a single-incision (SIS) versus a retropubic mid-urethral sling (RP) placed at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy in women with pelvic organ prolapse and objectively confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 180
- At least 21 years of age
- Vaginal bulge symptoms as indicated by an affirmative response of >1 to question 3 of the PFDI-SF20
- POP ≥ stage II according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system45, with evidence of apical descent
- Women being considered for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (with or without concomitant hysterectomy)
- Objective SUI: positive standardized cough stress test on clinical examination or on urodynamic study with reduced prolapse
- Understanding and acceptance of the need to return for all scheduled follow-up visits and willing to complete study questionnaires
- Able to give informed consent
- Prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence including mid-urethral sling; Burch/MMK; fascial pubovaginal sling (autologous, xenograft or allograft); and urethral bulking injection
- Any serious disease, or chronic condition, that could interfere with the study compliance
- Unwilling to have a synthetic sling
- Untreated and unresolved urinary tract infection
- Poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1c > 9 within 3 months of surgery date)
- Neurogenic bladder/ pre-operative self-catheterization
- Elevated post-void residual/PVR (>150 ml) that does not resolve with prolapse reduction testing (pessary, prolapse reduced uroflow or micturition study)
- Prior pelvic radiation
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Current genitourinary fistula or urethral diverticulum
- Planned concomitant bowel related surgery including sphincteroplasty and perineal rectal prolapse surgery, rectovaginal fistula repair, hemorrhoidectomy
- Pregnant or Planning to Conceive
- Incarcerated
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description SIS Group SIS Participants assigned to the single-incision sling (SIS) group will have the SIS placement procedure RP Sling Group RP Sling Participants assigned to the retropubic (RP) sling group will have the RP sling placement procedure
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence 5 years after surgery Measured by a positive response of \> 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Functioning Short Form (PISQ-IR) Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5 Questionnaire consists of 20 questions regarding sexual functioning. PISQ-IR consists of two parts. Part 1, for not Sexually Active (NSA) women, and par 2 for SA women. Response value varies from 1 to 5. Part 1, for not SA (NSA) women, where higher scores indicate a greater impact of the condition on sexual inactivity. Part 2, for SA women, with higher scores indicating better sexual function.
Pelvic Floor Impact (PFIQ-SF7) Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5 Consists of 3 scales with each 7 questions and will be used to assess quality of life regarding pelvic floor related quality of life. The total score is the sum of the three scale score with a range of 0-300. Higher values indicate a greater degree of bother
Assessment of post-void residual (PVR) volume Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5 Post Void Residual/PVR measurement - (collected via bladder scan or CIC) (Clean Intermittent Catheterization). PVR can be as minimum as 0ml of an average bladder capacity of 400ml
Number of Participants needing Retreatment 6 month up to 5 year post-surgery Surgical intervention for urinary retention (sling lysis) at any time point after surgery
Number of Participants needing bladder drainage beyond 6 weeks post-surgery Requirement of urinary catheter due to incontinence or retention
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale Surgeon ease of Use) Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5 This will be assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The score is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a greater degree of satisfaction.
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative baseline - lower scores denote improvement - 1= Very much better to 7 = Very much worse
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-SF20) Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5 The PFDI-20 has a total of 20 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Distress Inventory, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory). The outcomes of this questionnaire will be evaluated stratified by compartment. Each item produces a response of 0 to 4, the average response in each scale is multiplied by 25 to obtain the scale score (range 0 to 100). The total score is the sum of the three scale score with a range of 0-300. Higher values indicate a greater degree of bother.
Trial Locations
- Locations (7)
Florida Robotic and Minimally Invasive Urogynecology
🇺🇸Coconut Creek, Florida, United States
Augusta University
🇺🇸Augusta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern Medicine
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Boston Urogynecology Associates
🇺🇸Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
University of Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
🇺🇸Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Pelvic Floor Foundation of South Africa, University of Cape Town
🇿🇦Cape Town, South Africa