Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03645174
NCT03645174CompletedNot Applicable

Fiberoptic-guided Endotracheal Intubation Through Laryngeal Mask Airway in Manikin; Long Endotracheal Tube vs. Aintree Intubating Catheter

Ajou University School of Medicine2 sites in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
20
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Intubation time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In difficult airway situation, fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation through laryngeal mask airway(LMA) is one of option. Aintree catheter is a device to help change LMA to endotracheal tube, but it needs complex and multiple process. Long endotracheal tube can solve this problem of Aintree catheter. The purpose of this study is proving the efficacy of long endotracheal tube compared to Aintree cathter in fiberoptic-guided intubation through LMA.

Detailed Description

In difficult aiway situation, fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation through laryngeal mask airway(LMA) is one of option according to Difficult intubation guidelines. First, insert LMA and insert fiberoptic through LMA. Second, insert endotracheal tube using fiberoptic as a guide. This process has several problem. Removal of LMA is impossible, so there is a risk of dislodging of endotracheal tube.

Aintree catheter is developed to this problem. Insert Aintree catheter through LMA using fiberoptic, and remove LMA, finally insert endotracheal tube throug Aintree catheter. But the problem of this method is that the whole process is complex and takes long time. And there is a risk of impeding of endotracheal tube at glottis level because the difference of diameters between endotracheal tube and aintree catheter.

Long endotracheal tube could solve the problems mentioned above. Through LMA, insert endotracheal tube using fiberoptic as a guide. Tube is long enough to remove LMA without a risk of dislodging. And after removal of LMA, tube can be cut for optimizing length.

So the purpose of this study is comparing the efficacy of Aintree catheter method and Long tube method in manikin.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Residents of Anesthesiology
  • Who has less than 10 times of experience of fiberoptic intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Who has more than 10 times of experience of fiberoptic intubation
  • Who deny participating in the study

Arms & Interventions

Aintree catheter

Active Comparator

Fiberoptic-guided intubation through LMA, using Aintree catheter

Intervention: Aintree catheter (Device)

Long tube

Experimental

Fiberoptic-guided intubation through LMA, using long tube

Intervention: Using long tube (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation time

Time Frame: 3 minutes

from entry of fiberoptic at LMA to Ambu bagging

Secondary Outcomes

  • Difficulty score(5 minutes)
  • Success rate(5 minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor
Ajou University School of Medicine
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

In-kyong Yi

Clinical assitant professor

Ajou University School of Medicine

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials