Accuracy of Guided Ridge Splitting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Dental Implant
• Interventions: Procedure: dental implant placement with ridge splitting.

• Registration Number: NCT06333912
• Lead Sponsor: Alexandria University

Brief Summary

Assessing whether is there a difference between computer-guided ridge splitting and conventional technique with simultaneous implant placement in patients with maxillary width deficiency.

Detailed Description

Two groups one treated with ridge splitting using guided surgery and the other one treated with freehand surgery and both groups had simultaneous dental implants the first one had guided placement and the other one was freehand.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2023-08-02
• Primary Completion: 2024-01-29
• Study Completion: 2024-02-27
• Status Verified: 2024-03
• Study First Submitted: 2024-03-21
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-03-21
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-03-21
• Study First Posted: 2024-03-27
• Last Update Posted: 2024-03-27

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 12

Inclusion Criteria

• Patient with missing maxillary anteriors or premolars teeth.
• Tooth extraction at the implant sites was performed at least 4 months before the surgery.
• The bone width of the crestal one -third (3-5 mm) with sufficient bone height allowing for simultaneous implant placement.
• Free from any systemic disease or local pathological lesions that may affect bone healing or contraindicate implant placement.
• With no history of any previous grafting surgeries at the area of interest.

Exclusion Criteria

• Sever concavity of the alveolar ridge.
• Bad oral hygiene ( Silness-Löe index (score 2-3).
• Heavy smoker (smoke greater than or equal 25 cigarettes per day).
• Presence of acute infections or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth.
• Parafunctional habits.
• Pregnant females.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
control group treated with conventional ridge splitting.	dental implant placement with ridge splitting.	Freehand surgery is done including ridge splitting and implant plaement
study group treated with guided ridge splitting.	dental implant placement with ridge splitting.	virtual surgical planning using planning software Blue Sky Bio (BSB) and 3D printed surgical guide are fabricated to guide the ridge splitting procedure and implant drilling and placement.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Assessing the accuracy of guided surgery	one week	superimposition of post-op cbct to the planned position to check the accuracy of implant positions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
the bone-width increase between control and study group.	6 months	evaluation of two techniques of ridge splitting in increasing bone width.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Alexandria University, Faculty of dentistry; 🇪🇬 Alexandria, Egypt