MedPath

Evaluation of Dental Implant Placement in the Sloped Alveolar Ridge

Not Applicable
Conditions
Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Interventions
Device: Control
Device: Sloped
Registration Number
NCT03543618
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of sloped dental implants. It can reduce the need of osteoectomy, reduce discomfort of procedures, and is easier for maintenance.

Detailed Description

20 OsseoSpeed ™ Profile EV and 20 OsseoSpeed ™ EV groups will be randomly implanted into the oblique edentulous ridges of subjects, and the treatment response will be monitored for 3 years. The implantation area will be randomly divided into two groups, One group was treated with OsseoSpeed ™ Profile EV (sloped group) and the other group was treated with OsseoSpeed ™ EV (control group). The same patient had the same implant as the same quadrant.

The patient will be followed up regularly for follow-up, followed by clinical attachment level, probing depth, bleeding on probing, keratinized gingival width (Keratinized gingiva), mobility (mobility) and other clinical indicators of the measurement, regular dental radiography, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collection and bone integration measurement.

After six months of implantation, prosthesis will delivered and loaded functionally, and regular follow-up will be arranged. In each time of follow-up, examination will be carried out with regards to periodontal pocket depth, clinical attachment height, periodontal bleeding index, keratinized gingival width, and other clinical indicators of the measurement, at the end of the experiment, that is, after three years, and then a dental root film irradiation, GCF collection and osseointegration measurement.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ControlControlInstallation of conventional design dental implant
SlopedSlopedInstallation of sloped design dental implant
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical assessment of the status of osseointegrationup to 3 years

radiographic bone level, bone consolidation index (ISQ)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The peri-implant health1 year, 2 years, 3 years

radiographic bone level, clinical attachment level, pocket depth, periodontal bleeding (bleeding on probing), keratinized gingival width (masticatory mucosa width)

The health status of adjacent teeth0 day, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

radiographic bone level, clinical attachment level, pocket depth, periodontal bleeding (bleeding on probing), keratinized gingival width (masticatory mucosa width)

Biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid of adjacent teeth0 day, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Inflammatory markers such as Interleukin-1 beta, matrix metalloproteinase-8, Interleukin-8, or Interleukin-10

Biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid of dental implant1 year, 2 years, 3 years

Inflammatory markers such as Interleukin-1 beta, matrix metalloproteinase-8, Interleukin-8, or Interleukin-10

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath