Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03543618
NCT03543618UnknownNot Applicable

Evaluation of Dental Implant Placement in the Sloped Alveolar Ridge

National Taiwan University Hospital1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: March 15, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Clinical assessment of the status of osseointegration

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of sloped dental implants. It can reduce the need of osteoectomy, reduce discomfort of procedures, and is easier for maintenance.

Detailed Description

20 OsseoSpeed ™ Profile EV and 20 OsseoSpeed ™ EV groups will be randomly implanted into the oblique edentulous ridges of subjects, and the treatment response will be monitored for 3 years. The implantation area will be randomly divided into two groups, One group was treated with OsseoSpeed ™ Profile EV (sloped group) and the other group was treated with OsseoSpeed ™ EV (control group). The same patient had the same implant as the same quadrant.

The patient will be followed up regularly for follow-up, followed by clinical attachment level, probing depth, bleeding on probing, keratinized gingival width (Keratinized gingiva), mobility (mobility) and other clinical indicators of the measurement, regular dental radiography, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collection and bone integration measurement.

After six months of implantation, prosthesis will delivered and loaded functionally, and regular follow-up will be arranged. In each time of follow-up, examination will be carried out with regards to periodontal pocket depth, clinical attachment height, periodontal bleeding index, keratinized gingival width, and other clinical indicators of the measurement, at the end of the experiment, that is, after three years, and then a dental root film irradiation, GCF collection and osseointegration measurement.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Control

Sham Comparator

Installation of conventional design dental implant

Intervention: Control (Device)

Sloped

Active Comparator

Installation of sloped design dental implant

Intervention: Sloped (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical assessment of the status of osseointegration

Time Frame: up to 3 years

radiographic bone level, bone consolidation index (ISQ)

Secondary Outcomes

  • The peri-implant health(1 year, 2 years, 3 years)
  • The health status of adjacent teeth(0 day, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years)
  • Biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid of adjacent teeth(0 day, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years)
  • Biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid of dental implant(1 year, 2 years, 3 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials