Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation
- Conditions
- Jaw, Edentulous, PartiallyJaw, Edentulous
- Interventions
- Device: Straumann BoneCeramicDevice: Bio-Oss
- Registration Number
- NCT00901017
- Lead Sponsor
- Institut Straumann AG
- Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to test the efficacy on bone formation of Straumann Bone Ceramic as a grafting material applied in buccal bone dehiscences on simultaneously placed oral implants.
- Detailed Description
This is a randomized, controlled, split mouth, prospective, single centre study. The total study duration for each patient should be 76 weeks +/-18 months.
In total 8 visits per patient are scheduled in this study.
The study devices Straumann Bone Ceramic and Bio-Oss are CE-marked, and approved by the FDA. The products are used within the indication.
One center in Beligum will participate.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
- Males and females, 18 years to 80 years of age
- At least two missing teeth up to full edentulous arches.
- Desiring implant supported restorations.
- Both study implants should have a self-containing (2-wall) buccal dehiscence defect after oral implant placement (at least 3.0 mm / max. 5.0 mm defect in apico-coronal aspect to be measured from the boarder of the rough surface of the oral implant to the bottom of the defect).
- At least 4mm of the implant, measured from the apical end to the lowest margin of the bone level, should be covered with bone.
- Sufficient bone volume such that both oral implants will not encroach on vital structures and primary stability of the oral implant can be achieved;
- Patients must be committed to the study and must sign informed consent.
- Patient in good general health as documented by self assessment;
- Full mouth plaque score of <20%;
- Any systemic medical condition that could interfere with the surgical procedure or planned treatment;
- Current pregnancy or breast feeding/ lactating at the time of recruitment;
- Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene;
- Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse causing systemic compromise.
- Patients who smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day.
- Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which could represent a general contra-indication for surgical procedure or would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability
- Lack of primary stability of 1 or both implant(s) at surgery, measured by hand testing. In this instance the patient must be withdrawn and treated accordingly.
- Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus
- History of local radiation therapy.
- Presence of osseous pathologies.
- Presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy)
- Severe bruxing or clenching habits.
- Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis.
- Bone surgery at the implant site(s) (bone grafts, guided tissue regeneration techniques for bone enhancement) prior to implant placement unless performed more than 6 months prior to implant placement.
- Patients presenting clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of maxillary sinus disease.
- Existing teeth in the residual dentition with untreated endodontic pathologies.
- Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Straumann BoneCeramic Straumann BoneCeramic Straumann BoneCeramic Bio-Oss Bio-Oss Geistlich Bio-Oss
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change of Vertical Height of Buccal Defects Baseline to 26 weeks Change of vertical height of buccal defects over 26 weeks, measured during 1st - and 2nd- stage surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implant Success Rate 12 months The success of oral implant will be determined according to the following parameters:
* Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.
* Absence of implant mobility (based on hand testing)
* Absence of a peri-implant infection with suppuration.
* Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).
* Bone level changes evaluated on periapical radiographs around implants less than 1 mm during the first year of loading, starting at abutment connection.Implant Survival Rate 12 months A surviving implant will be considered an implant fulfilling the following criteria:
* Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.
* Absence of implant mobility.
* Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).
* Absence of pain or any other adverse observation by the patient, so that the implant has to be removed.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
š§šŖLeuven, Belgium