MedPath

Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Jaw, Edentulous
Interventions
Device: Straumann BoneCeramic
Device: Bio-Oss
Registration Number
NCT00901017
Lead Sponsor
Institut Straumann AG
Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to test the efficacy on bone formation of Straumann Bone Ceramic as a grafting material applied in buccal bone dehiscences on simultaneously placed oral implants.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, controlled, split mouth, prospective, single centre study. The total study duration for each patient should be 76 weeks +/-18 months.

In total 8 visits per patient are scheduled in this study.

The study devices Straumann Bone Ceramic and Bio-Oss are CE-marked, and approved by the FDA. The products are used within the indication.

One center in Beligum will participate.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
14
Inclusion Criteria
  • Males and females, 18 years to 80 years of age
  • At least two missing teeth up to full edentulous arches.
  • Desiring implant supported restorations.
  • Both study implants should have a self-containing (2-wall) buccal dehiscence defect after oral implant placement (at least 3.0 mm / max. 5.0 mm defect in apico-coronal aspect to be measured from the boarder of the rough surface of the oral implant to the bottom of the defect).
  • At least 4mm of the implant, measured from the apical end to the lowest margin of the bone level, should be covered with bone.
  • Sufficient bone volume such that both oral implants will not encroach on vital structures and primary stability of the oral implant can be achieved;
  • Patients must be committed to the study and must sign informed consent.
  • Patient in good general health as documented by self assessment;
  • Full mouth plaque score of <20%;
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any systemic medical condition that could interfere with the surgical procedure or planned treatment;
  • Current pregnancy or breast feeding/ lactating at the time of recruitment;
  • Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene;
  • Alcoholism or chronically drug abuse causing systemic compromise.
  • Patients who smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day.
  • Conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which could represent a general contra-indication for surgical procedure or would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non-compliance, or unreliability
  • Lack of primary stability of 1 or both implant(s) at surgery, measured by hand testing. In this instance the patient must be withdrawn and treated accordingly.
  • Mucosal diseases such as erosive lichen planus
  • History of local radiation therapy.
  • Presence of osseous pathologies.
  • Presence of oral lesions (such as ulceration, malignancy)
  • Severe bruxing or clenching habits.
  • Local inflammation, including untreated periodontitis.
  • Bone surgery at the implant site(s) (bone grafts, guided tissue regeneration techniques for bone enhancement) prior to implant placement unless performed more than 6 months prior to implant placement.
  • Patients presenting clinical and radiological signs and symptoms of maxillary sinus disease.
  • Existing teeth in the residual dentition with untreated endodontic pathologies.
  • Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Straumann BoneCeramicStraumann BoneCeramicStraumann BoneCeramic
Bio-OssBio-OssGeistlich Bio-Oss
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of Vertical Height of Buccal DefectsBaseline to 26 weeks

Change of vertical height of buccal defects over 26 weeks, measured during 1st - and 2nd- stage surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implant Success Rate12 months

The success of oral implant will be determined according to the following parameters:

* Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.

* Absence of implant mobility (based on hand testing)

* Absence of a peri-implant infection with suppuration.

* Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).

* Bone level changes evaluated on periapical radiographs around implants less than 1 mm during the first year of loading, starting at abutment connection.

Implant Survival Rate12 months

A surviving implant will be considered an implant fulfilling the following criteria:

* Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency based on radiographic findings.

* Absence of implant mobility.

* Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics).

* Absence of pain or any other adverse observation by the patient, so that the implant has to be removed.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

šŸ‡§šŸ‡Ŗ

Leuven, Belgium

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath