Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy
- Conditions
- Bladder InjuryComplication of Surgical ProcedureUreter InjurySurgical Injury
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: carbon dioxide cystoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT06278753
- Lead Sponsor
- Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.
- Detailed Description
It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 540
- laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients
- The operation will be performed in our hospital
- Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign
- After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital.
- Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies
- malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings
- Patients do not want to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description carbon dioxide cystoscopy carbon dioxide cystoscopy carbon dioxide cystoscopy arm
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method It was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of carbon dioxide cystoscopy. one year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method It was aimed to evaluate the speed and image quality of carbon dioxide cystoscopy in detecting intravesical masses. one year
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Tepecik Training and Research Hospital
🇹🇷İzmir, Eurasia, Turkey