Prognostic Value of Clinical and Biological Factors in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
- Registration Number
- NCT01369784
- Lead Sponsor
- Grupo Español de Linfomas y Transplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of clinical and biological factors in patients with refractory/relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
- Detailed Description
The main aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of R-IPI at diagnosis and relapse, relating it with the obtained response after second line
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 158
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Predictive Value of R-IPI at Diagnosis At diagnosis R-IPI Index (Revised International Prognostic Index) At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment, an average of 2 years The IPI is based on the evaluation of 5 clinical factors: age \> 60 years Ann Arbor stage III or IV disease \> 1 extra nodal site European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) _ 2, increased serum LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) levels Revised IPI (R-IPI) evaluates the same parameters, but groups them differently to form 3 prognostic groups of patients with significantly different progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method p-53 Expression At diagnosis immunohistochemical reaction of cells with p-53 antibody
p53 Expression At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment immunohistochemical reaction of cells with p-53 antibody
Multiple Myeloma Oncogene 1 (MUM-1) Expression At diagnosis immunohistochemical reaction of cells with MUM-1 antibody
Bcl-2 Expression At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment immunohistochemical reaction of cells with Bcl-2 antibody
Bcl-6 Expression At the beginning of the second line of treatment immunohistochemical reaction of cells with Bcl-6 antibody
MUM-1 Expression At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment immunohistochemical reaction of cells with MUM-1 antibody
Ann Arbor Staging At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment Ann Arbor=I: Best condition Ann Arbor=IV: Worst condition
Response to First Line of Treatment After first line treatment Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions for at least 8 weeks.
Partial response (PR): At least a 50% dicrease in the sum of the products of two measurements (the maximum diameter of a tumor and the largest diameter perpendicular to this maximum diameter) of 6 biggest individual tumors. Not increased of measure of other tumors, spleen or liver Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 50% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions during or at the end of the treatment.Response to Second Line of Treatment After second line of treatment Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions for at least 8 weeks.
Partial response (PR): At least a 50% dicrease in the sum of the products of two measurements (the maximum diameter of a tumor and the largest diameter perpendicular to this maximum diameter) of 6 biggest individual tumors. Not increased of measure of other tumors, spleen or liver Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 50% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions during or at the end of the treatment.Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd (Second) Line of Treatment and Bcl-2 Expression at Diagnosis At diagnosis Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd Line of Treatment and Bcl-6 Expression at Diagnosis At diagnosis Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd Line of Treatment and Multiple Myeloma Oncogene 1 (MUM1) Expression at Diagnosis At diagnosis Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) Performance Status At the beginning of the 2nd line of treatment ECOG=0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction ECOG=5: Exitus
Relationship Between Global Response Rate to 2nd Line of Treatment and p53 Expression at Diagnosis At diagnosis Global response rate was assessed using the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines. Responses are: complete response, partial response, stable disease, progression and relapse
Trial Locations
- Locations (56)
Hospital de Elda
🇪🇸Elda, Alicante, Spain
H. U. Central de Asturias
🇪🇸Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol
🇪🇸Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital General de Granollers
🇪🇸Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
ICO-DYR
🇪🇸Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Althaia
🇪🇸Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Parc Taulí
🇪🇸Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de Mataró
🇪🇸Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
H. Sierrallana
🇪🇸Torrelavega, Cantabria, Spain
Hospital Galdakao
🇪🇸San Sebastián, Guipuzcoa, Spain
Hospital San Pedro
🇪🇸Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
H. Clínico U. Santiago de Compostela
🇪🇸Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain
H.U. Fundación Alcorcón
🇪🇸Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
H.U.de Getafe
🇪🇸Getafe, Madrid, Spain
H. Severo Ochoa
🇪🇸Leganés, Madrid, Spain
Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
🇪🇸Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
Hospital de Navarra
🇪🇸Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
H. Universitario de Canarias
🇪🇸La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
H. Nuestra Señora del Prado
🇪🇸Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
Hospital Clinic i Provincial
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hospital del Mar
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Vall D'Hebrón
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Institut Catalá d'Oncologia de Girona
🇪🇸Gerona, Spain
H.U. Virgen de las Nieves
🇪🇸Granada, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén
🇪🇸Jaén, Spain
Hospital de León
🇪🇸León, Spain
C.H.U. A Coruña
🇪🇸La Coruña, Spain
Hospital Xeral
🇪🇸Lugo, Spain
Hospital de Cabueñes
🇪🇸Gijón, Asturias, Spain
Hospital Costa del Sol
🇪🇸Marbella, Málaga, Spain
Hospital General del SAS de Jerez
🇪🇸Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
Hospital Son Llatzer
🇪🇸Mallorca, Spain
H. Basurto
🇪🇸Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
H.U. Nuestra Señora de Valme
🇪🇸Sevilla, Spain
H. Virgen de La Concha
🇪🇸Zamora, Spain
Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova
🇪🇸Lérida, Spain
H. Ramón y Cajal
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
H. U. La Princesa
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
H.U. La Paz
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hospital 12 de Octubre
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
MD Anderson
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
H.U. Virgen de la Arrixaca
🇪🇸Murcia, Spain
Hospital Morales Messeguer
🇪🇸Murcia, Spain
H. Carlos Haya
🇪🇸Málaga, Spain
Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense
🇪🇸Orense, Spain
Hospital Universitario Son Dureta
🇪🇸Palma de Mallorca, Spain
H. Universitario de Salamanca
🇪🇸Salamanca, Spain
H. General de Segovia
🇪🇸Segovia, Spain
H. Arnau de Vilanova
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
H. Dr. Peset
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
H. Clínico de Valencia
🇪🇸Valencia, Spain
H. Río Hortega
🇪🇸Valladolid, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid
🇪🇸Valladolid, Spain
H. Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles
🇪🇸Ávila, Spain
H. Txagorritxu
🇪🇸Vitoria, Álava, Spain