跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02040805
NCT02040805已完成不适用

Comparison of Peer Facilitated Support Group and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Hoarding Disorder

University of California, San Francisco4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 323 人开始时间: 2014年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
323
试验地点
4
主要终点
Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R)

研究概览

简要总结

This study proposes to compare two forms of treatment for Hoarding Disorder (HD), a common and impairing neuropsychiatric syndrome that has a profound impact on the lives and functioning of individuals, families, and society. Specifically, we will compare a novel community-based group treatment led by individuals from the community who are not mental health professionals to the current standard of care treatment for Hoarding Disorder, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, conducted by psychologists in a group setting. We hypothesized that both treatment types will be similarly effective in reducing hoarding severity.

详细描述

The study design for this proposal is a stratified, randomized, single-blind, non- inferiority trial comparing the current standard of care for treatment of Hoarding Disorder (HD), Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (G-CBT), to an innovative and promising community-based treatment, Group Buried in Treasures (G-BiT). Participants will be stratified by gender, psychiatric status (high vs. low burden of psychiatric symptoms) and insurance status (insured vs. under- or un-insured) so that equal numbers of individuals with each of these characteristics are randomized to each treatment arm. They will then be randomly assigned (randomized) to either G-CBT or G-BiT. Participants will know which treatment group they are assigned to, but those members of the research team who are conducting clinical or neuropsychological assessments or analyzing the data will not; they will be blinded to participant group assignment, and group leaders will be blinded to the psychiatric status, neurocognitive status, insurance status, etc, of participants. The study is a non-inferiority trial, that is, the hypothesis to be tested is that G-BiT is as effective, or no less effective, than G-CBT. We chose a non-inferiority design because we have no reason to believe G-BiT is better than G-CBT and our preliminary data, as well as outcomes previously reported for G- CBT and G-BiT, suggest that these treatments may have similar efficacies.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosis of Hoarding Disorder

排除标准

  • Individuals with active psychosis, schizophrenia, intellectual disability, or known dementia will be excluded
  • Individuals who have participated in either cognitive-behavioral therapy for hoarding (group or individual) or in group Buried in Treasures in the past year

结局指标

主要结局

Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R)

时间窗: Administered at screening before start of treatment groups and after last treatment group (20 weeks later).

This is a 23-item self-report questionnaire that measures hoarding symptoms and their impact, including problems with acquisition, clutter, and difficulty discarding, as well as distress and impairment/interference. The SI-R is scored on a scale of 0-92. Higher scores indicate more severe hoarding, and scores of 42 and over are considered clinically significant hoarding. Although subscale scores can be calculated, this study uses total scores as the primary outcome.

次要结局

  • Activities of Daily Living Scale, Hoarding (ADL-H)(Administered at baseline and after last treatment group (20 weeks later).)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验