Efficacy of a Blended Learning Programme in Enhancing the Communication Skill Competence and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students in Conducting Clinical Handovers: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 96
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change from baseline communication skill competence at 2 weeks after they received the intervention
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a blended learning programme in enhancing the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of final-year nursing students in conducting clinical handovers.
Detailed Description
A clinical handover refers to the process of transferring the relevant information and facilitating continuity of patient care from one healthcare provider to another. It is an essential nursing practice that ensures patient safety. The information transmitted during the handover must be clear, concise and systematic to facilitate the provision of continuous patient care. Ambiguous communication and unsystematically transmitted information can often impede the clarity of ideas, result in the omission of important patient information and delay medical treatment, consequently endangering the safety of patients. Nursing students and newly graduated nurses often struggle with clinical handovers due to a lack of communication skill competence and self-efficacy in performing this practice.
Blended learning programmes (BLPs) are commonly used as constructivist pedagogical approaches in nursing education. BLPs have been used successfully to teach theoretical courses and psychomotor skills in nursing education and have been proven to benefit the knowledge, self-efficacy, motivation, attitudes and perceived competence of students. However, no studies that examine the efficiency of BLPs in enhancing the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of nursing students in conducting clinical handovers have been found. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the efficacy of BLP in improving the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of nursing students in conducting clinical handovers.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description
The assessor was blinded to the group assignment so that the scores remained unbiased.
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •were Hong Kong residents who could speak Cantonese and read Chinese and English
- •were aged at least 18 years
- •had not previously enrolled in a clinical handover training programme.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Arms & Interventions
Experimental group
The participants in the experimental group received a blended learning programme with face-to-face training and an online module on handover practice.
Intervention: A Blended Learning Programme (Other)
waitlist control group
The participants in the waitlist control group received the same face-to-face training workshop as the experimental group. However, these participants were invited to access the online module only after data collection was completed.
Intervention: Waitlist control group (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change from baseline communication skill competence at 2 weeks after they received the intervention
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 weeks after they received the intervention
The participants' communication skill competence in conducting clinical handovers was assessed using the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) Communication and Communication Clarity tool. The assessment had 23 items that were rated on a Likert scale. Higher scores correspond to better performance.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change from baseline self-perceived communication self-efficacy level in conducting clinical handovers at 2 weeks after they received the intervention(From baseline to 2 weeks after they received the intervention)
Investigators
Li Ho Cheung William
Professor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
