Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02678715
NCT02678715TerminatedNot Applicable

Effectiveness of Three Oral Devices as Mouthguard in Electroconvulsive Therapy.

Eva Willaert Jiménez-Pajarero1 site in 1 country4 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Sponsor
Enrollment
4
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
temporomandibular pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This observer-blind crossover intervention study aims to determine the most effective type of device as oral mouthguard in modified-Electroconvulsive Therapy (m-ECT) comparing three types of devices: standard, prefabricated and manufactured in the dental laboratory.

Patients from the ECT Unit of Psychiatric Department of the University Hospital of Bellvitge will use the three devices at a random sequence during the twelve treatment sessions, so each device (A, B, C) will be used for two weeks, that is, for four consecutive sessions.

Detailed Description

Treatment with electroconvulsive therapy will involve the application of 12 m-ECT sessions at the rate of two sessions for six weeks according to the protocol established in the ECT Unit of the Department of Psychiatry at the University Hospital of Bellvitge.

Two devices, SB and CA, will be prepared for each patient and placed in mouth before anesthesia by one operator. This operator will assign a randomized sequence of use of the three devices (SB, CA or SM). Device SM will be the sole protector that will be placed after the anesthesia by nurse.

The outcome assessor will the scans pre- and post-session m-ECT and collect data, accede the surgery room before the session with the patient conscious and perform the exploration. This outcome assessor will leave the operating room during the procedure for the application of m-ECT an come back an hour later for the post-examination session.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients should have an intellectual level that allows a proper communication and must agree to cooperate in all tests and exams required by the study protocol.
  • •Obtaining written informed consent for participating in the project (model consent form)
  • •The patient must have enough teeth in the upper arch or being a carrier of a stable removable prosthesis.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Being in a maintenance ECT program.
  • •Receiving ECT during the six months prior to the index episode.
  • •Pregnancy and lactation.

Arms & Interventions

Sequence SB-CA-SM

Experimental

Solubrux®+ Customized Appliance + Somatics®

Intervention: Solubrux® (Device)

Sequence SB-CA-SM

Experimental

Solubrux®+ Customized Appliance + Somatics®

Intervention: Customized Appliance (Device)

Sequence SB-CA-SM

Experimental

Solubrux®+ Customized Appliance + Somatics®

Intervention: Somatics® (Device)

Sequence SB-SM-CA

Experimental

Solubrux®+Somatics®+Customized Appliance

Intervention: Solubrux® (Device)

Sequence SB-SM-CA

Experimental

Solubrux®+Somatics®+Customized Appliance

Intervention: Customized Appliance (Device)

Sequence SB-SM-CA

Experimental

Solubrux®+Somatics®+Customized Appliance

Intervention: Somatics® (Device)

Sequence CA-SB-SM

Experimental

Customized Appliance+Solubrux®+Somatics®

Intervention: Solubrux® (Device)

Sequence CA-SB-SM

Experimental

Customized Appliance+Solubrux®+Somatics®

Intervention: Customized Appliance (Device)

Sequence CA-SB-SM

Experimental

Customized Appliance+Solubrux®+Somatics®

Intervention: Somatics® (Device)

Sequence CA-SM-SB

Experimental

Customized Appliance+Somatics®+Solubrux®

Intervention: Solubrux® (Device)

Sequence CA-SM-SB

Experimental

Customized Appliance+Somatics®+Solubrux®

Intervention: Customized Appliance (Device)

Sequence CA-SM-SB

Experimental

Customized Appliance+Somatics®+Solubrux®

Intervention: Somatics® (Device)

Sequence SM-SB-CA

Experimental

Somatics®+Solubrux®+Customized Appliance

Intervention: Solubrux® (Device)

Sequence SM-SB-CA

Experimental

Somatics®+Solubrux®+Customized Appliance

Intervention: Customized Appliance (Device)

Sequence SM-SB-CA

Experimental

Somatics®+Solubrux®+Customized Appliance

Intervention: Somatics® (Device)

Sequence SM-CA-SB

Experimental

Somatics®+ Customized Appliance+Solubrux®

Intervention: Solubrux® (Device)

Sequence SM-CA-SB

Experimental

Somatics®+ Customized Appliance+Solubrux®

Intervention: Customized Appliance (Device)

Sequence SM-CA-SB

Experimental

Somatics®+ Customized Appliance+Solubrux®

Intervention: Somatics® (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

temporomandibular pain

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of six weeks

Continuous quantitative variable assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) of 100 mm in length, marking the end as no pain (source) or the worst pain imaginable (final)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Dental fractures(through study completion, an average of six weeks)
  • Dental mobility assessed by Periotest®(through study completion, an average of six weeks)
  • Oral soft tissues injuries(through study completion, an average of six weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
Eva Willaert Jiménez-Pajarero
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Eva Willaert Jiménez-Pajarero

DDS, PhD

University of Barcelona

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials