Principal Investigator
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Patient Satisfaction
- Sponsor
- Tanta University
- Enrollment
- 180
- Primary Endpoint
- clinical evaluation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Although the success of total hip arthroplasty, many patients were dissatisfied postoperatively. Patient's reported outcome measures become of a great importance in assessment of the results after joint replacement. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate and compare postoperative patient's satisfaction after implantation of two commonly used different designs of total hip arthroplasty.
Detailed Description
The investigators conducted a prospective comparative study carried out on 180 patients suffering of hip arthritis between 2011 and 2018. They were randomized into two groups of homogenous demographic and clinical data. Group A was treated by cementless T.H.A. with a large head while group B received cementless T.H.A. with a dual mobility cup. Clinical evaluation and preoperative patient's expectation were assessed and compared to the postoperative satisfaction.
Investigators
ahmed m. samy
assistant professor
Tanta University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Unilateral hip arthritis
- •Age up to 65 years
- •Body mass index (BMI) up to 35
- •Modified Charnley comorbidity classification equal to A
Exclusion Criteria
- •Neurological deficit (e.g. Parkinsonism, stroke)
- •Bone type c not fit for cementless fixation
- •Poly-arthritis, active inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
- •Any patient with psychiatric disorders
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
clinical evaluation
Time Frame: about 5 years
WOMAC score
patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: about 5 years
measurement by patient's reported outcomes measures
pain assessment
Time Frame: about 5 years
VAS score