MedPath

Efficacy and Safety Study of OPC-1085EL Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Ocular Hypertension
Glaucoma
Interventions
Drug: OPC-1085EL ophthalmic solution
Registration Number
NCT02105285
Lead Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of OPC-1085EL ophthalmic solution in comparison with carteolol long-acting ophthalmic solution in subjects who are insufficiently responsive to carteolol long-acting ophthalmic solution.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
193
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with diagnosis of bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects with ocular conditions as defined by the protocol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
OPC-1085EL ophthalmic solutionOPC-1085EL ophthalmic solutionOnce daily
Carteolol long-acting ophthalmic solutionCarteolol long-acting ophthalmic solutionOnce daily
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 PredoseBaseline, Week 8 Predose

Comparison of each group in change from baseline in intraocular pressure. Arm of "a treatment group coming together with latanoprost / carteolol" is a reference group. As for "Primary Outcome" and "Secondary Outcome" analysis , the OPC-1085EL group was compared only to the carteolol group, not to the latanoprost/carteolol concomitant group.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 8 Hours After IMP AdministrationWeek 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration

Comparison of each group in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration.

Arm of "a treatment group coming together with latanoprost / carteolol" is a reference group. As for "Primary Outcome" and "Secondary Outcome" analysis , the OPC-1085EL group was compared only to the carteolol group, not to the latanoprost/carteolol concomitant group.

The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome.

Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 2 Hours After IMP AdministrationWeek 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration

Comparison of each group in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration.

Arm of "a treatment group coming together with latanoprost / carteolol" is a reference group. As for "Primary Outcome" and "Secondary Outcome" analysis , the OPC-1085EL group was compared only to the carteolol group, not to the latanoprost/carteolol concomitant group.

The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome.

Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 PredoseWeek 8 Predose

Comparison of each group in intraocular pressure at Week 8 Predose. Arm of "a treatment group coming together with latanoprost / carteolol" is a reference group. As for "Primary Outcome" and "Secondary Outcome" analysis , the OPC-1085EL group was compared only to the carteolol group, not to the latanoprost/carteolol concomitant group.

The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome.

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 8 Hours After IMP AdministrationBaseline, Week 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration

Comparison of each group in change from baseline in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 8 hours after IMP administration.

Arm of "a treatment group coming together with latanoprost / carteolol" is a reference group. As for "Primary Outcome" and "Secondary Outcome" analysis , the OPC-1085EL group was compared only to the carteolol group, not to the latanoprost/carteolol concomitant group.

The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome.

Decrease From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure at Week 8 at 2 Hours After IMP AdministrationBaseline, Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration

Comparison of each group in change from baseline in intraocular pressure at Week 8 at 2 hours after IMP administration.

Arm of "a treatment group coming together with latanoprost / carteolol" is a reference group. As for "Primary Outcome" and "Secondary Outcome" analysis , the OPC-1085EL group was compared only to the carteolol group, not to the latanoprost/carteolol concomitant group.

The number of subjects showed in the Participant Flow comes from all the subjects administered IMP. For efficacy analysis, on the other hand, several subjects were excluded from the analysis according to the statistical analysis plan. For example, subjects without IOP after administration were excluded. In addition, IOP measurement at 8 hours was not mandatory. That is why there are differences between the number in the Participant Flow and Outcome.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath