Alfentanil vs Remifentanil in Patient-controlled Sedation During ERCP.A Randomized Double-blind Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 81
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- consumption of propofol and opioid
研究概览
简要总结
Self-administration of propofol and opioid mixture by the patient him- or herself (patient-controlled sedation, PCS) could be successful alternative to the anesthesiologists-managed deep sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, it is not known which opioid would be the most suitable for PCS. The aim of this double-blind study was to compare remifentanil and alfentanil in PCS during ERCP.
详细描述
Deep sedation with propofol has been suggested necessary for successful performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Airway obstruction, hypoventilation and hypoxemia occurs in deeply sedated patients with a high incidence of 12-30%.As a result of frequent hypoxemia events, deep sedation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.Careful monitoring of vital signs and involving of anesthesia-trained personal are recommended for deeply sedated patients.Self-administration of propofol by the patient him- or herself (patient-controlled sedation, PCS)could be a safer way to use propofol without the presence of an anesthesiologist. In comparison to the anesthesiologists managed deep sedation the main advantages of PCS are reduced consumption of anesthetics and faster recovery.A combination of propofol and different opioids is widely used for PCS however, it is not known which opioid would be the most suitable one. Remifentanil is a potent opioid with ultra short duration of action and usually administered as a constant infusion. The elimination half-life of alfentanil is 8-32 minutes being about 3 times longer, than that of remifentanil. Both opioids have been evaluated previously in PCS but comparative studies are lacking. This study was carried out in order to compare remifentanil and alfentanil in PCS during ERCP in terms of propofol consumption, sedation levels, endoscopist´s and patient's satisfaction. The investigators also sought information about frequency of sedation related complications associated with the different opioids.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •elective ERCP patients
排除标准
- •allergy to propofol or opioid analgesics, drug addiction, inability to co-operate, ASA class greater than 3, or patient's refusal.
研究组 & 干预措施
remifentanil
sedative mixture for PCS consisting of propofol 10mg/ml 20 ml and remifentanil 50 mkg/ml 5 ml
干预措施: remifentanil (Drug)
alfentanil 0.04 mg/ml
sedative mixture for PCS consisting of propofol10 mg/ml 20 ml,alfentanil 0.5 mg/ml 2 ml, NaCL 9 mg/ml 3 ml
干预措施: alfentanil (Drug)
alfentanil 0.08 mg/ml
sedative mixture for PCS consisting of propofol 10 mg/ml 20 ml, alfentanil 0.5 mg/ml 4 ml,NaCl 9mg/ml 1ml
干预措施: alfentanil (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
consumption of propofol and opioid
时间窗: one day
vital signs
时间窗: one day
Heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), breathing rate, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) constant monitoring. Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP)measuring at 5 min intervals.
次要结局
- sedation levels(one day)
- pain intensity(one day)
- patient´s and endoscopist´s satisfaction with sedation(one day)
- incidence of nausea(one day)
研究者
Maxim Mazanikov
M.D.
Helsinki University Central Hospital
