MedPath

CTNAV II : Multicentric Evaluation of IMACTIS-CT Navigation System

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Biopsy
Punction
Ablation
Drainage
Interventions
Device: Navigation station (IMACTIS-CT®)
Device: CT
Registration Number
NCT01896219
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Brief Summary

Estimate the medical service of a system of navigation (IMACTIS-CT®)in terms of SAFETY, EFFICIENCY and PERFORMANCE, in comparison with the reference method during gestures of interventional radiology under scan in the thoraco-abdominal level.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
464
Inclusion Criteria
  • More or equal the 18 years old
  • Patient for whom an indication of diagnostic or therapeutic percutaneous interventional gesture in the thoraco-abdominal level under CT guidance is prescribed
  • Patient affiliated to social security or similarly regime
  • Patient signed consent for participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient with a medical device using a magnetic field (eg, patient with a pacemaker)
  • Patient who presents ferromagnetic foreign bodies intracorporeal close to the working zone of Radiologist, and that can interact with the medical device
  • Pregnant women and lactating mothers
  • Ward of court or under guardianship
  • Person deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision
  • Person under legal protection

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Gesture performed under Navigation-assisted procedure (NAV)Navigation station (IMACTIS-CT®)Use of the IMACTIS-CT® Navigation System
Gesture performed under control tomodensitometric (CT)CTConventional
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Estimate the medical service of a system of navigation (IMACTIS-CT ®) in terms of SAFETY, EFFICIENCY and PERFORMANCE, in comparison with the reference method during interventional radiology gestures2 hours

Three criteria are estimated:

* Safety: number of major complications (due to gesture)

* Efficiency: number of targets achieved

* Performance: number of scancontrol made during the puncture

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison (IMACTIS-CT ® vs References) of the operator satisfaction during his gesture.2 hours

Scale of quantitative satisfaction

Comparison (IMACTIS-CT ® vs. Reference) of the radiation dose delivered during the puncture.2 hours
Evaluation of delivered medical service by carrying out a sub-group analysis according to the stratification of the difficulty of gesture2 hours
Evaluation of the navigation system use by the operators, based on needle holder localization files2 hours
Comparison of the duration of needle setting up procedure between IMACTIS-CT® and the reference method.2 hours

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Ambroise Paré University Hospital

🇫🇷

Boulogne Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, France

University Hospital

🇫🇷

Lille, Nord, France

University Hospital of Saint-Louis

🇫🇷

Paris, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath