MedPath

The Effects of Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Intravenous IRON Therapy With Ferric DerisomaltOSE in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Heart Failure
Iron Deficiency
Interventions
Drug: High-dose ferric derisomaltose
Drug: Low-dose ferric derisomaltose
Registration Number
NCT06427343
Lead Sponsor
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Brief Summary

This study will address whether intravenous (IV) iron repletion with a more intensive target will provide greater benefits in improving exercise capacity for patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency. One group of participants will receive a high-dose IV iron regimen with a more intensive target, and the other group will receive a low-dose IV iron regimen with a less intensive target.

Detailed Description

Iron deficiency is a common and important comorbidity in heart failure. Randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated a beneficial effect of IV iron on exercise capacity and quality of life in iron-deficient patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. However, these randomized controlled trials exhibit striking heterogeneity in targeting levels for maintenance strategies of IV iron repletion. Some studies (FERRIC-HF, FAIR-HF) withheld intravenous iron in cases of ferritin \>800 ng/mL, hemoglobin \>16.0 g/dL, or transferrin saturation (TSAT) \>50%, while other studies (HEART-FID, IRONMAN) focused on targeting levels that are simply above the definition of iron deficiency. Additionally, the PIVOTAL trial showed that high-dose IV iron decreased recurrent heart failure events in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared to a lower-dose regimen. Whether functional outcomes differ between those on lower versus higher iron repletion targets among patients with heart failure remains unknown. This study will help us address this question.

This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label blind endpoint study to assess the effects of high-dose IV iron repletion compared to a low-dose IV iron repletion on 12-month change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2) for patients with chronic heart failure and concomitant iron deficiency.

Patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a high-dose IV iron regimen and a low-dose IV iron regimen. After the initial iron repletion, ferritin concentration and TSAT were measured every three months and the results used to determine the dose of ferric derisomaltose during the follow-up period. In the high dose group, iron dosing will repeat as long as the serum ferritin was not \>700ng/mL, or if TSAT was not \>40%. Patients in the low dose group will receive repeat iron dosing if ferritin \<100 ng/mL, or if ferritin 100-300 ng/mL and TSAT \<20%, in line with criteria for iron deficiency in current guidelines.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
114
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age >18 years.
  2. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% within 2 years prior to planned randomization (assessed by echocardiography or MRI).
  3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II ~ III.
  4. Either hospitalization for HF within 6 months prior to planned randomization or elevated plasma levels of natriuretic peptides within 3 months of randomization. a. For patients in sinus rhythm: NT- proBNP >300 pg/mL or BNP >100 pg/mL. b. For patients in atrial fibrillation: NT-proBNP >600 pg/mL or BNP >200 pg/mL.
  5. Subjects with stable CHF (NYHA II/III functional class) on optimal background therapy (as determined by the investigator) for at least 4 weeks with no dose changes of heart failure drugs during the last 2 weeks (with the exception of diuretics).
  6. Serum ferritin <100 ng/mL or serum ferritin 100-300 ng/mL and TSAT <20%.
  7. Able and willing to perform a CPET at the time of randomization.
  8. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL or Hemoglobin >15.0 g/dL.
  2. Renal dialysis or MDRD/CKD-EPI estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 ml/min/1.73m2.
  3. Body weight <35 kg.
  4. Heart failure was secondary to valvular diseases or congenital heart diseases.
  5. History of acquired iron overload; known hemochromatosis or first relatives with hemochromatosis.
  6. Known hypersensitivity to ferric derisomaltose or other IV iron product.
  7. Known active infection (defined as currently treated with oral or intravenous antibiotics), bleeding (gastrointestinal hemorrhagia, menorrhagia, history of peptic ulcer with no evidence of healing or inflammatory bowel disease), malignancy, and hemolytic anemia.
  8. History of chronic liver disease and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) >3 times the upper limit of the normal range; myelodysplastic disorder; and known HIV/AIDS disease.
  9. Acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, transient ischemic attack, or stroke within 3 months prior to randomization.
  10. Revascularization therapy (coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous intervention, or major surgery) within 3 months prior to randomization; or planning cardiac surgery or revascularization.
  11. Already receiving erythropoietin, IV or oral iron therapy, and blood transfusion in previous 30 days prior to randomization.
  12. Use of concurrent immunosuppressive therapy
  13. Any of the following diseases that hinders exercise testing: severe musculoskeletal disease, unstable angina, obstructive cardiomyopathy, severe uncorrected valvular disease, or uncontrolled slow or rapid arrhythmia (mean ventricular rate >100 beats/min at rest), or uncontrolled hypertension with blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg.
  14. Investigator considers a possible alternative diagnosis to account for the patient's HF symptoms: severe obesity, primary pulmonary hypertension, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  15. Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  16. Participation in another intervention study involving a drug or device within the past 90 days.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
High doseHigh-dose ferric derisomaltoseParticipants randomized to this arm will receive repeat iron dosing as long as the serum ferritin was not \>700 ng/mL, or if TSAT was not \>40% during follow-up. Iron to be administered as ferric derisomaltose. Ferric derisomaltose will be administered according to the dosing schedule determined by the patient's body weight and hemoglobin value. Infused over a minimum of 15 mins for doses up to and including 1000mg, and a minimum of 30 mins for doses \>1000mg.
Low doseLow-dose ferric derisomaltoseParticipants randomized to this arm will receive repeat iron dosing if ferritin \<100 ng/mL or if ferritin 100-300 ng/mL and TSAT \<20% during follow-up. Iron to be administered as ferric derisomaltose in analogy to high-dose arm.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in peak VO2 (ml/min/kg)Baseline to Week 52

Peak VO2 measured by a maximal effort Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in heart rate at peak exercise (bpm)Baseline to Week 52

Measured by CPET

Change in skeletal muscle iron content by magnetic resonance imaging T2 starBaseline to Week 52

Measured by skeletal muscle magnetic resonance imaging

Change in cognitive function score by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)Baseline to Week 52

The MMSE is a cognitive test. The score is ranged from 0-30 (units of a scale). 30 points is the better outcome. The investigators will assess the change in the score.

Change in concentration of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, pg/mL)Baseline to Week 52

Tested in blood samples

Change in VO2 at ventilatory threshold (ml/min)Baseline to Week 52

Measured by CPET

Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, %)Baseline to Week 52

Assessed by echocardiography

Mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization ratesUp to 52 weeks

Effects on mortality and HF-related hospitalization rates in patients with heart failure.

Change in peak respiratory exchange ratioBaseline to Week 52

Measured by CPET

Change in myocardial iron content by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging T2 starBaseline to Week 52

Measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Change in the clinical summary score by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)Baseline to Week 52

The KCCQ is a validated instrument for self-assessment of quality of life and health status in heart failure patients. The clinical summary score, which is derived from the physical limitations and heart failure symptoms domains of the KCCQ is a valid measure for assessing the patient's health aspects that may be influenced by CV medications. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

Change in left ventricular global longitudinal stress (LVGLS, %)Baseline to Week 52

Assessed by echocardiography

Change in 6-minute walking distance (m)Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52
Change in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire indexed valueBaseline to Week 52

EQ-5D-5L: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels The EQ 5D questionnaire consists of a health descriptive system for participants to self-classify and rate their health status on the day of administration. The descriptive system includes 5 items/dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, which are coded from 1 (best state) to 5 (worst state).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath