跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03494166
NCT03494166已完成不适用

Post-chemotherapy Symptom Management: Testing Intervention Sequences in a SMART Design

University of Arizona2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 498 人开始时间: 2018年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
498
试验地点
2
主要终点
Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization

研究概览

简要总结

Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years were interviewed at baseline and stratified as high or low need for symptom management based on comorbidity and depressive symptoms.

High need survivors were randomized initially to the 12-week Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH, N=282) or 12-week SMSH Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC, N=93) added during weeks 1-8. After 4 weeks of the SMSH alone, non-responders on depression were re-randomized to continue with SMSH alone (N=30) or add TIPC (N=31).

详细描述

Nearly 15.5 million Americans have survived cancer and virtually all have experienced symptoms from cancer treatment. Numerous symptom management interventions have been tested during active treatment, yet few have addressed the continuing fatigue, pain, depression, etc. that endure following the end of treatment.

Existing post-treatment symptom management research has targeted survivors months after the end of active treatment, overlooking the immediate post-treatment period. During this period, some survivors have their symptoms resolve naturally (low need for intervention), while others suffer from high symptom burden (high need for intervention), with 30% experiencing depression. Sample: Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years.

Design: The SMART design incorporates two interventions with proven efficacy and addresses heterogeneity of survivors' responses by following the clinical logic of starting with one intervention, assessing its success, and continuing it when effective. High need survivors will be initially randomized to receive 1) weekly symptom assessment with referral for elevated symptoms to a printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH) or 2) a more intensive intervention adding Telephone Interpersonal Counselling (TIPC) to the SMSH. After 4 weeks, non-responders to SMSH alone on depression were re-randomized to continue SMSH for 8 more weeks to allow for symptom resolution, or TIPC added for the remaining 8 weeks.

The primary outcome was symptom severity index, secondary outcome was depressive symptoms. The hypotheses tests included comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes according tp first randomization and second randomization for non-responders.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Data collectors will be blinded to the arm of the study.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Survivors must have a new diagnosis or localized recurrence of solid tumor cancer
  • •Be finishing curative intent adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation, and do not have any subsequent cancer treatments planned, except for radiation therapy, hormonal therapy or trastuzumab for breast cancer.
  • •18 years of age or older
  • •Have access to a telephone
  • •Understand English or Spanish
  • •Are not currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy

排除标准

  • •Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in medical record verified by the recruiter
  • •Nursing home resident
  • •Bedridden
  • •Currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy.

研究组 & 干预措施

Low Need Benchmark or Follow-up

No Intervention

In the low need benchmark or follow-up group, survivors completed detailed baseline and 13-week assessments (about 30-40 minutes) over the telephone. A brief assessment (about 5 minutes) at week 4 over the telephone was used to assess symptoms.

High Need A: Start with SMSH alone for 4 weeks

Experimental

Participants were mailed the printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMH). The Group A participant was called every week for 4 weeks to ask about symptoms and suggest strategies from the SMH to relieve symptoms. After 4 weeks, participants were re-randomized to continue in SMH for 8 more weeks or to add Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC) Intervention for the subsequent 8 weeks. If the TIPC was added, the counselor called the participant once per week for about 35-40 minutes to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At week 13, the participant completed the second assessment.

干预措施: Start with SMSH alone (Behavioral)

High Need B: Start with SMSH+TIPC

Experimental

Participants were called every week for the first 8 weeks using a combination of TIP-C and SMH. The counselor called to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At the end of 8 weeks, the final 4 calls followed the SMSH alone protocol. At week 13, the second assessment was conducted.

干预措施: Start with SMSH+TIPC (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization

时间窗: Weeks 1-13

Symptoms were measured using the modified General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) allowing for a quick assessment of 18 symptoms: fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, headache, difficulty concentrating, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, numbness or tingling, skin rashes or sores, swelling, weakness, shortness of breath, cough, depression, and anxiety. Respondents indicated the severity of each symptom (0 = not present to 10 = worst possible). A summed symptom severity index for 17 symptoms other than depression was averaged over weeks 1-13 from each weekly contact, baseline, and 13-week interviews. Potential range 0-170, with higher score indicating worse outcome (greater severity). Because the collection of symptoms does not form a scale, internal consistency reliability was not applicable.

Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by Second Randomization

时间窗: Weeks 5-13

Symptoms were measured using the modified General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) allowing for a quick assessment of 18 symptoms: fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, headache, difficulty concentrating, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, numbness or tingling, skin rashes or sores, swelling, weakness, shortness of breath, cough, depression, and anxiety. Respondents indicated severity of each symptom (0 = not present to 10 = worst possible). A summed symptom severity index for 17 symptoms other than depression was averaged over weeks 5-13 from each weekly contact, baseline, and 13-week interviews. Potential range 0-170, higher value reflect worse outcome (greater symptom severity). Because the collection of symptoms does not form a scale, internal consistency reliability was not applicable.

次要结局

  • Depressive Symptoms - Comparison of Two Groups Created by Second Randomization(Week 13)
  • Depressive Symptoms- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization.(Week 13)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验