Study of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (KTE-X19) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2)
- Conditions
- Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02601313
- Lead Sponsor
- Kite, A Gilead Company
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to test how well the study drug, brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19), works in participants with relapsed/refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
- Detailed Description
Study KTE-C19-102 enrolled participants with r/r MCL who have been treated with up to 5 prior regimens including a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. However, to fulfill FDA Postmarketing Requirement, Cohort 3 is added to the study. It will include participants with r/r MCL who have been treated with up to 5 prior regimens but have not received prior therapy with a BTKi.
The primary analysis in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 is already completed. Data for Cohort 3 will be analyzed separately. Therefore, details for Cohort 3 were registered separately (NCT04880434) on ClinicalTrials.gov as this cohort will not be part of the main study analysis.
After the end of KTE-C19-102, subjects who received an infusion of anti-CD19 CAR T cells will complete the remainder of the 15-year follow-up assessments in a separate long-term follow-up study, KT-US-982-5968
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 105
Up to 5 prior regimens for Mantle cell lymphoma. Prior therapy must have included:
- Anthracycline or bendamustine-containing chemotherapy and
- Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy and
- Ibrutinib or acalabrutinib
At least 1 measurable lesion
Platelet count ≥ 75,000/uL
Creatinine clearance (as estimated by Cockcroft Gault) > or = to 60 mL/min
Cardiac ejection fraction ≥ 50%, no evidence of pericardial effusion as determined by an echocardiogram (ECHO), and no clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
Baseline oxygen saturation >92% on room air.
Key
- Known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B (HBsAG positive) or hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV positive). A history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C is permitted if the viral load is undetectable per standard serological and genetic testing
- History of a seizure disorder, cerebrovascular ischemia/hemorrhage, dementia, cerebellar disease, cerebral edema, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, or any autoimmune disease with central nervous system (CNS) involvement
- Presence of fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection that is uncontrolled or requiring IV antimicrobials for management.
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Axicabtagene ciloleucel/brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) brexucabtagene autoleucel Participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will receive conditioning chemotherapy (CTE) consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day intravenous (IV) infusion for 3 days followed by a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells/kg on Day 0 or brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 2 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 1 or brexucabtagene autoleucel at a targeted dose of 0.5 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.5 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 2. Axicabtagene ciloleucel/brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) Cyclophosphamide Participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will receive conditioning chemotherapy (CTE) consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day intravenous (IV) infusion for 3 days followed by a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells/kg on Day 0 or brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 2 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 1 or brexucabtagene autoleucel at a targeted dose of 0.5 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.5 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 2. Axicabtagene ciloleucel/brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) Fludarabine Participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will receive conditioning chemotherapy (CTE) consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day intravenous (IV) infusion for 3 days followed by a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells/kg on Day 0 or brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 2 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 1 or brexucabtagene autoleucel at a targeted dose of 0.5 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.5 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 2. Axicabtagene ciloleucel/brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Participants with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will receive conditioning chemotherapy (CTE) consisting of fludarabine 30 mg/m\^2/day and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m\^2/day intravenous (IV) infusion for 3 days followed by a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells/kg on Day 0 or brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) at a targeted dose of 2 x 10\^6 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 2 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 1 or brexucabtagene autoleucel at a targeted dose of 0.5 x 10\^6 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg, with a maximum dose of 0.5 x 10\^8 anti-CD19 CAR T cells for participants ≥ 100 kg on Day 0 in Cohort 2.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per the Lugano Classification According to Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) in Cohort 1 Up to 7.8 years OR: complete metabolic response(CMR),complete radiological response(CRR),partial MR response(PMR),partial RR(PRR).CMR:score 1(no uptake above background)/2(uptake ≤ mediastinum)/3(uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver)with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale;no new lesions.CRR:target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in longest transverse diameter of lesion(LDi);no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesion(NMLs);organ enlargement regress to normal;no new sites;bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR:score 4(uptake moderately \> liver)/5(uptake markedly \> liver, new lesions)with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass;no new lesions;responding disease at interim/residual disease at end of treatment (EOT).PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters(SPD)of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs;spleen regressed by \> 50% in length beyond normal.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Per the Lugano Classification According to Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) in Cohort 2 Up to 7.8 years OR: CMR, CRR, PMR, PRR. CMR: score 1(no uptake above background) / 2(uptake ≤ mediastinum) / 3(uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale; no new lesions. CRR: target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi; no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent non-measured lesion NMLs; organ enlargement regress to normal; no new sites; bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR: score 4(uptake moderately \> liver) /5 (uptake markedly \> liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass; no new lesions; responding disease at interim/residual disease at EOT. PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites; absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs; spleen regressed by \> 50% in length beyond normal. Percentages were rounded off.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by International Working Group (IWG) 2007 Criteria in Cohort 1 Up to 7.8 years OR: CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence; typically FDG-avid lymphoma (a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted if it is PET negative); variably FDG-avid lymphomas/FDG avidity unknown (all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size); spleen and/or liver should be normal size and not be palpable; bone marrow aspirate and biopsy must show no evidence of disease. PR: 50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 largest dominant nodal masses and ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of spleen/liver nodules; no increase in size of nodes, liver, or spleen and no new sites of disease; splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by ≥ 50% in the SPD; if participant has persistent bone marrow involvement and otherwise meets criteria for CR, will then be considered a PR; typically FDG-avid lymphoma (the post-treatment PET scan should be positive in at least 1 previously involved site. Percentages were rounded off.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort 1 as Per Investigator Response. Up to 7.8 years PFS was defined as the time from the brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion date to the date of PD or death from any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately \> liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim or end of treatment assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology (eg, infection, inflammation); new or recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow. PFS was determined using the KM estimates.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort 2 as Per Investigator Response. Up to 7.8 years PFS was defined as the time from the brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion date to the date of PD or death from any cause. PD: a score 4 (uptake moderately \> liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim or end of treatment assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology (eg, infection, inflammation); new or recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow. PFS was determined using the KM estimates.
Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Hematology Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade Up to 5 years Percentage of Participants With Increase in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Hematology Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade Up to 5 years Percentage of Participants With Decrease in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Chemistry Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade Up to 5 years Percentage of Participants With Increase in Post-brexucabtagene Autoleucel Infusion Chemistry Toxicity Values by Worst Toxicity Grade Up to 5 years Peak Serum Levels of C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 (CXCL10), Granzyme B, Interferon-Gamma (IFN-γ), Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA), Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8,IL-10, IL-15, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) in Blood Baseline up to Week 4 Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine.
Percentage of Participants With Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Mobility Scale Score Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6 The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported. Percentages were rounded off.
Duration of Response (DOR) in Cohort 1 as Per Investigator Response Up to 7.8 years DOR: time from the first OR to progressive disease (PD)/death. It is determined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. PD: score 4 (uptake moderately \> liver)/ 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with: LDi \> 1.5 cm, increase by ≥ 50% from cross-product of LDi and perpendicular diameter (PPD) nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to the LDi from nadir, the splenic length must increase by \> 50% of the extent of its prior increase beyond baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, the increase must be ≥ 2 cm from baseline; new/recurrent splenomegaly; new or clear progression of pre-existing NMLs; new lesion; new/recurrent bone marrow involvement.
Duration of Response (DOR) in Cohort 2 as Per Investigator Response Up to 7.8 years DOR: time from the first OR to PD/death. It is determined using KM estimates. PD: score 4 (uptake moderately \> liver)/5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with an increase in intensity of uptake from baseline; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma at interim/EOT assessment; new FDG-avid foci consistent with lymphoma rather than another etiology; new/recurrent FDG-avid foci in bone marrow; an individual node/lesion must be abnormal with: LDi \> 1.5 cm, increase by ≥ 50% from cross-product of LDi and PPD nadir, increase in LDi or shortest axis perpendicular to the LDi from nadir, the splenic length must increase by \> 50% of the extent of its prior increase beyond baseline. If no prior splenomegaly, the increase must be ≥ 2 cm from baseline; new/recurrent splenomegaly; new or clear progression of pre-existing NMLs; new lesion; new/recurrent bone marrow involvement.
Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by International Working Group (IWG) 2007 Criteria in Cohort 1 Up to 7.8 years BOR consists of (Complete response \[CR\], Partial response \[PR\], stable disease \[SD\], progressive disease \[PD\] and unknown). CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence; PR: 50% decrease in the sum of the product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 largest dominant nodal masses and \>= 50% decrease in SPD of spleen/liver nodules; PD: appearance of any new lesions or \>= 50% increase in SPD of more than one node or \>= 50% increase in longest diameter of a previously identified node or \>50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previous lesions; SD: failure to attain CR/PR or PD. Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Best Objective Response (BOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by Lugano Classification in Cohort 2 Up to 7.8 years BOR consists of CR (CMR/CRR), PR (PMR/PRR), SD, PD and not done. CMR/CRR and PMR/PRR are defined in Outcome Measure (OM) 1. PD is defined in OM 3. SD/no metabolic response (NMR): a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than \[\>\] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/ or new lesions) with no significant change in FDG uptake compared to baseline (screening), at an interim time point or end of treatment; no new sites of disease should be observed. Not done: no assessment at the time of analysis. Percentages were rounded off. Only categories with data are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Per Investigator Assessment Determined by Lugano Classification in Cohort 2 Up to 7.8 years OR: CMR, CRR, PMR, PRR. CMR: score 1(no uptake above background) / 2(uptake ≤ mediastinum) / 3(uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver) with/without a residual mass on positron emission tomography 5-point scale; no new lesions. CRR: target nodes/nodal masses regressed to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi ;no extralymphatic sites of disease;absent NMLs; organ enlargement regress to normal; no new sites;bone marrow normal by morphology. PMR: score 4 (uptake moderately \> liver) /5 (uptake markedly \> liver, new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass; no new lesions; responding disease at interim/residual disease at EOT. PRR: ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extra-nodal sites;absent/normal, regressed, but no increase of NMLs; spleen regressed by \> 50% in length beyond normal. Percentages were rounded off.
Overall Survival in Cohort 1 Up to 7.8 years Overall survival was defined as the time from brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival was determined using the KM estimates.
Overall Survival in Cohort 2 Up to 7.8 years Overall survival was defined as the time from brexucabtagene autoleucel infusion to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival was determined using the KM estimates.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Up to 5 years An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participants. The event did not necessarily have a relationship with study treatment. AE included worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. Worsening indicated that the pre-existing medical condition had increased in severity, frequency, and/or duration or had an association with a worse outcome. A pre-existing condition that had not worsened during the study or involved an intervention such as elective cosmetic surgery or a medical procedure while on study, was not considered an AE. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset on or after the start of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-CD19 CAR Antibodies Baseline up to Month 3 Maximum Number of CAR T Cells Measured Post-infusion Up to Month 24 Peak Serum Levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Blood Baseline up to Week 4 Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine.
Peak Serum Levels of Ferritin, Interleukin-2 Receptor Alpha (IL-2Rα), Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1), Perforin, Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in Blood Baseline up to Week 4 Peak was defined as the maximum post-baseline level of the cytokine.
Percentage of Participants With Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Self-Care Scale Score Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6 The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported. Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Usual Activity Scale Score Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6 The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported. Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Pain / Discomfort Activity Scale Score Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6 The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported. Percentages were rounded off.
Percentage of Participants With Change Over Time in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions(EQ-5D) Anxiety / Depression Activity Scale Score Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6 The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a participant-answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each dimension the participant is asked for a three-level assessment of their health on the current day: "no problems" (1), "some problems" (2), "extreme problems" (3). EQ-5D health states, defined by the EQ-5D descriptive system, are converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values (also called QOL weights or QOL utilities) to each of the levels in each dimension. EQ-5D Summary Index values range from -0.11 (worst health state) to 1.00 (perfect health state). Positive numbers indicate improvement from baseline. The Percentage of participants with each level of problem are reported. Percentages were rounded off.
Change Over Time in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score Baseline, Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6 EQ-5D is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). The EQ5D-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. EQ-5D-VAS: range 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better self-reported health status. A positive change indicates an improvement.
Trial Locations
- Locations (32)
Loyola University Chicago
🇺🇸Maywood, Illinois, United States
Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Hospital Saint Louis
🇫🇷Paris, France
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Stanford University
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States
Hopital Haut-Leveque
🇫🇷Pessac, France
Universitaetsklinikum Wuerzburg
🇩🇪Wuerzburg, Germany
Academisch Medisch Centrum
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU)
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
University of Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Swedish Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
University California Los Angeles (UCLA)
🇺🇸Santa Monica, California, United States
City of Hope
🇺🇸Duarte, California, United States
Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Universitätsklinik Dresden
🇩🇪Dresden, Germany
Hackensack University Medical Center
🇺🇸Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
University Medical Center Groningen
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands
University of Rochester Medical Center
🇺🇸Rochester, New York, United States
Banner MD Anderson
🇺🇸Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Erasmus Medical Center
🇳🇱Rotterdam, Netherlands
Sarah Cannon
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
University of Miami
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States
Duke University Medical Center
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
🇺🇸Nashville, Tennessee, United States
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States