Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization exercises versus conventional physical therapy on pain, severity of symptoms and core muscle strength among female students with primary dysmenorrhea
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 36
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire
研究概览
简要总结
The study aims to compare the effectiveness of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) exercises versus Conventional Physical Therapy (CPT) in managing pain, symptom severity, and core muscle strength in female students with primary dysmenorrhea. Primary dysmenorrhea, characterized by menstrual pain without underlying pelvic pathology, significantly affects quality of life and daily activities. While pharmacological treatments exist, they often have side effects, making non-pharmacological approaches like exercise more favorable. DNS, a technique focusing on core stability through neuromuscular activation, is hypothesized to be more effective than conventional exercises. This randomized comparative study will assess outcomes over six weeks using the Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire, WaLIDD Score, and muscle activity via Pressure Biofeedback, aiming to provide insights into a non-invasive and effective intervention for menstrual pain relief.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Other
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19.00 Year(s) 至 24.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •Female students with primary dysmenorrhea with the WALLID Score more than
- •Nulligravida women Those who are willing to participate as voluntarily and have signed written informed consent form.
排除标准
- •People diagnosed with Secondary/ congestive dysmenorrhea Other pelvic pathologies like Endometriosis and Fibroids Any previous history of gynecological surgeries People not willing to participate.
结局指标
主要结局
Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire
时间窗: At Baseline and at 6 weeks
次要结局
- WaLIDD Score(Muscle activity assessed by Pressure Biofeedback)
