Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 343
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Cost comparison between Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy
研究概览
简要总结
Laparoscopic surgery is gaining currency in the field of oncologic care, particularly for colorectal and gynecologic cancers. This innovation could be used either for staging purpose and therefore could steer global therapeutic options or for surgical management only.
Increase knowledge and skills lead to an increase in the number and rate of the women this innovation could be offered. The project team observed a shift from traditional surgical management (abdominal radical surgery) towards laparoscopic with a focus on lymphadenectomy.
This innovation however increases some costs (the surgical stage) but decrease some others (the post surgical stage).
Foreseeing the pace of the dissemination needs to have objective and reliable data about who had access to laparoscopic surgery and who didn't (and why) and accurate assessment of related costs.
This program will focus on uterine cancer (both cervix and corpus).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age>18 years
- •Endometrial or cervical cancer
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Cost comparison between Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy
时间窗: 2 years
The following costs were included:Equipment costs,Instrument costs,Operating room costs,Hospital stay
Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures (Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy)
时间窗: 2 years
Comparison of the effectiveness of procedures will take into account conversion rate, complications rate, metastatic and pelvic relapse
次要结局
未报告次要终点