MedPath

Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy

Not Applicable
Conditions
Cerebrovascular Accident
Interventions
Other: Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy
Other: Usual and customary care
Registration Number
NCT02563886
Lead Sponsor
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intensive, focused training of the affected upper extremity after stroke results in long-term functional gains in moderately-to-severely paralyzed patients, more than 6 months after their vascular accident. During the course of therapy, user's attempts to move and complete exercises are assisted by neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Detailed Description

This pilot study quantifies functional gains induced by the Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy (EAMT), an extension of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy to moderately-to-severely paralyzed patients in their stable plateau phase of recovery. During EAMT, patients can assist affected upper limb movements through functional electrical stimulation. Initially, patients are divided in two groups. One of the groups receives EAMT, the other receives the best possible physical and occupational therapy. Therapy consists in 40 sessions of 45 minutes twice per day over five weeks, including a one-week therapy break. After 20 sessions, group allocation is crossed-over, and patients don't receive any therapy for one week.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of one, first ever stroke (both ischemic or hemorrhagic) verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT);
  • Chronic impairment after stroke (minimum 6 months);
  • No contraindications to MRI;
  • No contraindications to electrical stimulation;
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unstable recovery stage (difference between two examinations > 1 FMA-UE point);
  • Mild impairment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE >= 21);
  • Excessive spasticity of the affected arm (modified Ashworth Scale > 2);

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EAMT, then standard careElectrically Assisted Movement TherapyElectrically Assisted Movement Therapy precedes usual and customary care.
EAMT, then standard careUsual and customary careElectrically Assisted Movement Therapy precedes usual and customary care.
Standard care, then EAMTUsual and customary careUsual and customary care precedes Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy.
Standard care, then EAMTElectrically Assisted Movement TherapyUsual and customary care precedes Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE),T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)

A quantitative measure of motor impairment.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Wolf Motor Function TestT0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)

Quality and time of task performance

Motor Activity LogT0 (Before treatment); at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 18 and 30 weeks after treatment start

Semi-structured interview to assess arm function.

Modified Ashworth scaleT0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)

A quantitative measure of hand and arm spasticity

European stroke scaleT0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)

Overall functional status

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Service de Neuropsychologie et neuroréhabilitation - CHUV

🇨🇭

Lausanne, VD, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath