The Usage of Soda-Water in Gastric Preparation for Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy
- Conditions
- Capsule EndoscopyGastric Disease
- Interventions
- Procedure: Soda-water instead of pure water to observe gastric filling
- Registration Number
- NCT04479423
- Lead Sponsor
- Changhai Hospital
- Brief Summary
Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) is a noninvasive technique (90.4% sensitivity, 94.7% specificity and 93.4% accuracy) without requiring sedation or air insufflation, which makes it welcomed by most of participants. However, due to the large size of the stomach, clear views are obtained with the stomach distended. Participants were asked to drink 1000ml water for gastric preparation in a short time according to the standard procesure. It is hard for some participants especially the old and can cause discomfort. If the capsule stays in the stomach for a long time (\>4 hours), it will affect the completion rate of small intestine examination and be inconvient to both of the endoscopist and patient.
It is a promising way to fill the stomach with carbonated drinks in some diagnosis and treatment methods. A study using carbonated drinks for gastric filling in the procedure of multi slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) showed higher diagnostic rate for gastric cancer (85%VS80%). Rapid filling and absorption, greater comfort feeling and little pressure changes lead to higher acceptance of participants.
So, researchers have a novel idea using soda water to take place of pure water in the gastric preparation. The combination of gas and liquid in gastric filling greatly reduces the amount of fluid that participants need to drink, which makes the shorter preparation time and less feeling of fullness. In a pilot study before, investigators found the usage of soda water obtained similar gastric distention score and shorter gastric transit time (GTT) than standard preparation method.
This prospective, single blind, randomized controlleds trial aimed to prove the safety and efficiency of soda water in the process of gastric preparation and explore the impact on the follow-up small bowel examination.
- Detailed Description
This is a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled clinical study approved by the Endoscopy Center of Changhai Hospital in Shanghai from July, 2020 to September,2020. Approval to carry out this study was granted by the Ethics Committee, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University.
According to the results of our pilot study, 252 participants(with 20% withdrawal rate) aged 18-75 will accept standard gastric preparation or gastric preparation with soda water randomly (ratio 1:1).All patient will provid written informed consent for this study before undergoing baseline MCE.
Investigators evaluated the feasibility of a novel gastric preparation methods regimens on gastric distention,gastric cleansing, feeling of fullness, diagnostic yield, satisfaction questionnaire, gastric transit time, small bowel transit time and completion rate. The safety were evaluated at two week after procedure for the occurance of adverse events. Investigators also plan to explore whether soda water can affect the subsequent examination of the small intestine, and the difficulty in intervention under special circumstances.
All participants underwent a bowel preparation that consisted of a low-residue diet for 24 hours, fluid intake, and ingestion of 2L polyethylene glycol-based electrolyte solution 12 hours before the examination. On the examination day, participants arrived at hospital in the morning after an over night fast (\>8hours). Then they would be randomly assigned to controll group or soda group.
Control group:40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all participants swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg simethicone. During the period, participants were asked to have a proper walk to wash out bubbles. An additional 900ml clear water was drunk to obtain good vision before undergoing MCE examination.
Soda water group：Control group:40 minutes before capsule ingestion, all participants swallowed 100ml clear water containing 50mg simethicone. During the period, participants were asked to have a proper walk to wash out bubbles. An additional 400ml soda water was drunk to obtain good vision before undergoing MCE examination.
Then, the patient enter the examination room to finish the examination.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 252
- Over 18 years and below 75 years of age
- Plan to undergo MCCG examination in Changhai Hospital
- dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, fistulas and strictures;
- history of gastrointestinal surgery or suspected delayed gastric emptying;
- Implanted metallic devices such aspacemakers, defibrillators, artificial heart valves or joint prostheses;
- Allergic to high molecular materials such as simethicone and streptozyme;
- Pregnancy or mentally ill person;
- currently participating in another clinical study;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Soda water Soda-water instead of pure water to observe gastric filling 400ml soda water was drunk to obtain good vision before undergoing MCE examination.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gastric Filling of 0-5 minutes 0-5 minutes after the capsule opened According to the extension of gastric plica on the great curvature, the score of gastric filling is ranged from 1 to 5 as excellent (smooth and basically no plica,score 5), good (the height of gastric plica \<the distance between the adjacent gastric plica: score 4), fair (the height of gastric plica nearly same to the distance between the adjacent gastric plica: score 3),average (the height of gastric plica \> the distance between the adjacent gastric plica: score 2) and poor (the folds gathered, and the gastric mucosa between plica is haedly to be seen, score 1).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic Yield (DY) After the procedure(within 5 days) diagnostic yield including polyp, ulcer, gastric fundus varices, submucosal tumor, and carditis. The difuse lesions such as superfcial, atrophic, and erosive gastritis were defned as negative fndings.
Satisfaction score of patients After the procedure immediately All subjects were asked about tolerance of the procedure in the following areas using a questionnaire of Preprocedure Perception and Postprocedure Satisfaction, which including ease of swallowing, pain or discomfort experienced during and after the procedure, overall tolerability of the procedure, and overall convenience of the procedure (a score of 0-4,with 0 as the worst and 4 as the best respectively, ranged from 2 to 44).
Gastric Filling score of 5-10 minutes 5-10 minutes after the capsule opened According to the extension of gastric plica on the great curvature, the score of gastric filling is ranged from 1 to 5 as excellent (smooth and basically no plica,score 5), good (the height of gastric plica \<the distance between the adjacent gastric plica: score 4), fair (the height of gastric plica nearly same to the distance between the adjacent gastric plica: score 3),average (the height of gastric plica \> the distance between the adjacent gastric plica: score 2) and poor (the folds gathered, and the gastric mucosa between plica is haedly to be seen, score 1).
Fullness score Before examination Fullness is the subjective feeling of patients assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS typically take the form of a straight line with two extreme states anchored at either end. In this study, it is a 100mm VAS with a question"How full do you feel?"anchored with "not at all full"at the left side and "as full as I have ever felt" at the right side. Patients will be asked to mark their feelings on the line. The distance (mm) between the far left and the marked point is the score of fullness. 0 represents no perception at all, 10 indicates pain and needs to be stopped immediately.
Completion Rate (CR) After the procedure(within 5 days) The completion of stomach was defined as the observation of cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus and the completion of small bowel examination was defined as the ileocecal valve was photographed.The completion rate in each group was defined as the percentage of patients with a complete examination out of the total number of patients examined.
Liquid for gastric refilling During the procedure Count the numbers of patients who needs extra liguid which is used for better gastric distention during the examination procedure and how much they needed.
Gastric Examination Time (GET) After the procedure(within 5 days) the time taken for the gastric examination to the endoscopist's satisfaction.
Gastric Cleanliness Score (GCS) After the procedure(within 5 days) Six primary anatomical landmarks of the stomach (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum, and pylorus) were recorded for evaluation. A 4-point grading scale was introduced to defne the cleanliness as excellent (no adherent mucus and foam: score 4), good (mild mucus and foam but do not obscure vision: score 3), fair (considerable amount of mucus or foam present precluding a completely reliable examination: score 2) and poor (large amount of mucus or foam residue needing water to clear it: score 1). GCS was the total scores of all six landmarks, ranging from 6 (completely unprepared) to 24 (perfect). GCS of≥18 was regarded as acceptable.
Transit Time After the procedure(within 5 days) esophageal transit time (ETT),gastric transit time (GTT) and small bowel transit time (SBTT)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Changhai Hospital
🇨🇳Shanghai, Shanghai, China