MedPath

Effects of Different Walking Exercises on Pain, Physical Performance and Balance in Knee Osteoarthritis

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Knee Osteoarthritis
Registration Number
NCT06802107
Lead Sponsor
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the effects of forward and backward walking exercises on treadmill in addition to traditional physiotherapy interventions on pain, physical performance and balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Secondarily, it is aimed to investigate the effects of walking on spatio-temporal parameters, knee joint position sense, range of motion, quadriceps, hamstring and hip adductors muscle strength, Q angle, quality of life and kinesiophobia.

Detailed Description

Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease in the world and causes varying degrees of loss of function in individuals in terms of pain, physical performance and balance ability due to the wear and tear in the joint cartilage. Exercise practices play a critical role in the management of knee osteoarthritis and various types of exercises are used to alleviate the symptoms of the disease. One of the exercises used in this context is walking. Today, various modified or designed walking training programs such as walking on land/water, weight-supported walking, positive pressure walking, walking on a treadmill, walking forward-backward, and walking uphill can be applied in the rehabilitation of individuals with osteoarthritis.

Exercises done on a treadmill offer individuals the opportunity to exercise safely in a controlled environment. In addition, forward and backward walking exercises done on a treadmill have the potential to improve balance and coordination by activating different muscle groups. Such dynamic exercises can facilitate the daily activities of osteoarthritis patients and increase their physical activity levels.

Some biomechanical research results on backward walking in recent years are quite interesting. It is stated that the quadriceps muscle works more concentrically and isometrically while the eccentric load decreases during backward walking and can be used to increase and strengthen the stability of the knee. In addition, according to studies conducted in recent years, walking backwards is a useful strategy to reduce knee load compared to forward walking. In light of these findings, it is a walking exercise type that is thought to be more effective for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. However, although there are many studies on the effects of walking exercise in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation, there are very few studies on backward walking in knee osteoarthritis. At the same time, it is unclear whether walking backwards provides an additional clinical benefit compared to walking forward in patients with knee osteoarthritis. In addition, there is no study comparing the effects of walking backwards and walking forward on the treadmill on pain, physical performance and balance, and there is a serious gap in the literature on this subject.

In light of this information in the literature, the primary purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the effects of walking forwards and backwards on the treadmill in patients with knee osteoarthritis on pain, physical performance and balance. Secondarily, the effects of gait on spatio-temporal parameters, knee joint position sense, range of motion, quadriceps, hamstring and hip adductors muscle strength, Q angle, quality of life and kinesiophobia will also be investigated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed with knee OA
  • According to the Kellgren Lawrence scale, grade I-II-III knee OA
  • VAS score above 3
Exclusion Criteria
  • Knee pain caused by other diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, gouty arthritis, etc.)
  • History of lower extremity surgery
  • Receiving physical therapy within the last 6 months
  • A medical condition that prevents safe exercise
  • Intra-articular injection (hyaluronic acid/steroid) application within the last 6 months
  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • Active and regular exercise,
  • Not volunteering to participate in the study
  • Patients with osteoporosis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain8 weeks

It will be evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS). VAS consists of a horizontal 10 cm long line, where "0" (zero) indicates no pain and "10" indicates unbearable pain. The patient is asked to indicate where their condition fits on this line by drawing a line, putting a dot or pointing.

Physical Function and Performance Measures8 weeks

6 minute walk test A test that evaluates functional capacity in individuals. The test is performed in a closed and uncrowded space. The distance between the starting and finishing points in a closed space should be 30 meters on a flat surface. The distance an individual can walk in this area in 6 minutes is evaluated in meters. Before the test begins, the patient is rested and information about the test is given to the patient. The patient is asked to walk between the starting and finishing points at their own walking pace. The test is monitored with a stopwatch. The purpose of the test is to measure the maximum distance they can walk during this time

balance8 weeks

Functional Reach Test A test developed to examine forward stability. During the test, participants' ability to reach forward while standing with their feet fixed is recorded as a distance and their balance performance is evaluated.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Spatio-temporal variables of gait8 weeks

Gaı̇t Analyzer application A smartphone-based application called "Gait Analyzer" will be used. It collects kinematic data of gait using smartphone technology and phone sensors. With this application, kinematic data of walking such as walking speed, cadence, step duration, step length, step length symmetry and step duration symmetry can be obtained. The smartphone is fixed to the region corresponding to the L3 proccesus spinosus of the patient with a suitable waist belt with velcro bandage. The patients are then asked to walk a distance of 20 meters at their natural gait and speed without walking aids and measurements are performed.

Quality of life8 weeks

EUROQL 5d 5l The scale consists of two parts: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ-VAS (visual analog scale).

knee joint position sense8 weeks

Joint position sense (JPS) is evaluated by the angular difference between a repeatedly determined target position and the predicted position, and this is called absolute angular error. This method is a reliable technique for the knee joint. JPS is tested by actively finding the joint position that was previously taught passively. In the study, 60° knee flexion were determined as target angles. It is planned to use a universal goniometer for the test.

Knee Range of Motion Assessment8 weeks

Knee flexion and extension will be measured with a universal goniometer.

Quadriceps, Hamstring and hip adduction strength8 weeks

Isometric muscle strength will be assessed with a hand-held dynamometer.

Q açısı8 weeks

It is planned to be measured with a universal goniometer. The pivot point of the goniometer is placed at the center of the patella, the fixed arm pointing to the tibia tuberosity and the movable arm pointing to the SIAS, and the angle between the line drawn from the SIAS to the middle of the patella and the two lines drawn from the middle of the patella to the tibia tuberosity is recorded.

Kinesiophobia8 weeks

Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale It was developed to evaluate the kinesiophobia of individuals. The scale consists of 17 questions. When calculating the scale score, the scores of some questions are reversed and calculated. A high total score indicates that the individual has high kinesiophobia.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hasan Kalyoncu University

🇹🇷

Gaziantep, Şahinbey, Turkey

Hasan Kalyoncu University
🇹🇷Gaziantep, Şahinbey, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.