Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03929783
NCT03929783CompletedNot Applicable

Improving PPV3 Using Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) in Diagnostic Assessment by Reducing Benign Tissue Diagnosis (FP3) - A Single-Arm Prospective Study

Thomas Jefferson University1 site in 1 country107 target enrollmentStarted: June 23, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
107
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Specificity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This pilot trial studies how well contrast enhanced mammography works in diagnosing patients with suspicious breast findings. Diagnostic procedures, such as contrast enhanced mammography, may help to reclassify findings seen on diagnostic mammography and ultrasound as benign or likely benign with what would otherwise require biopsy for confirmation.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To obtain preliminary data to support the hypothesis that contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) can reduce benign tissue diagnosis (FP3) and therefore improve positive predictive value 3 (PPV3).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Identify specific CEM characteristics that accurately classify a finding as benign, high-risk or malignant.

II. Assess the positive and negative predictive values for each digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), breast ultrasound and CEM.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
30 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Women with digital breast tomosynthesis and/or ultrasound assessments of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 lesions with recommendation of needle biopsy for tissue diagnosis.
  • •Abnormal findings include masses, focal, global or developing asymmetries, architecture distortions, or > 1 cm of suspicious calcifications with or without associated ultrasound abnormal findings.
  • •Scheduled for imaging guided percutaneous needle biopsy.
  • •Provide signed and dated informed consent form.
  • •If patient is of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test, urine or blood, within 14 days prior to the scan.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •< 1 cm span of calcifications without an ultrasound correlate.
  • •Pregnant patients.
  • •Patients with known allergy to iodinated contrast material.
  • •If patient answers YES to any of the below questions they need glomerular filtration rate (gFR) prior to contrast administration regardless of their age:
  • •Have you ever been told you have renal problems?
  • •Have you ever been told you have protein in your urine?
  • •Do you have high blood pressure?
  • •Do you have diabetes?
  • •Do you have gout?
  • •Have you ever had kidney surgery?

Arms & Interventions

Diagnostic (CEM)

Experimental

Patients undergo contrast enhanced mammography prior to scheduled standard of care core needle biopsy of the breast on the same day.

Intervention: Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Specificity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

False negative rate of US

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

Sensitivity of MM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

Sensitivity of contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (mammogram+ultrasound \[MM+US\] and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

Specificity of MM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

False negative rate of CEM

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

False negative rate of MM

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

False positive rate of MM

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

Sensitivity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

Specificity of CEM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

False positive rate of CEM

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

False positive rate of US

Time Frame: Up to 1 year

The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Negative predictive value of MM(Up to 1 year)
  • Negative predictive value of US(Up to 1 year)
  • Positive predictive value of CEM(Up to 1 year)
  • Positive predictive value of US(Up to 1 year)
  • Positive predictive value of MM(Up to 1 year)
  • Negative predictive value of CEM(Up to 1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials