Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates
Not Applicable
Terminated
- Conditions
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornLow Birth Weight InfantsContinuous Positive Airway Pressure
- Interventions
- Device: RAM CannulaDevice: Binasal Prong CPAP
- Registration Number
- NCT02168257
- Lead Sponsor
- Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the RAM cannula is as effective as conventional binasal prongs to deliver CPAP to low birth weight infants with respiratory distress.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 8
Inclusion Criteria
- Low Birth Weight Infant
- Currently on continuous positive aireway pressure of 5-7 cm water pressure
- Receiving continuous positive airway pressure support for > 24 hrs prior to enrollment
- Fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of 23-50%
Exclusion Criteria
- Fraction of inspired oxygen > 50%
- Congenital defects of head, pulmonary or cardiovascular systems
- Chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes
- Invasive Surgical Procedure within 24 hrs prior to enrollment
- Enrollment in separate clinical trial that has ongoing data collection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description RAM Cannula CPAP RAM Cannula CPAP provided by RAM Cannula Binasal Prong CPAP Binasal Prong CPAP CPAP provided by binasal prong
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Oxygenation 3 hrs Pulse oximetry
Ventilation 3 hrs transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Esophageal pressure measurements 3 hrs Esophageal Pressure Catheter
Apnea 3 hrs 3-channel pneumogram
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
🇺🇸Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States