MedPath

Efficacy of Brief Interventions to Reduce Comorbid Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse and Sleep Impairment in Young Adults (Rest-Up RCT)

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Insomnia
Alcohol Use
Marijuana Use
Registration Number
NCT06736444
Lead Sponsor
University of Washington
Brief Summary

This study is designed to evaluate an integrated intervention to reduce alcohol and marijuana use and consequences and improve sleep among young adults with comorbid heavy episodic drinking, marijuana use, and sleep impairment.

Detailed Description

This study is designed to evaluate an integrated brief intervention to reduce alcohol and cannabis use and consequences and improve sleep among young adults (YA) with comorbid heavy episodic drinking (HED), cannabis misuse, and sleep impairment. HED in YA is an important public health problem; consequences include accidental injury and death, academic/work problems, unsafe and unwanted sex, and development of alcohol use disorders. Many YA with HED also use cannabis and experience increased harm as a result. Sleep impairment is common and problematic among YA, identified as one of 5 leading barriers to academic success for students and an important risk factor for mental health problems and suicide in YA. More than 75% of YA report frequent daytime fatigue, 27% extreme distress related to sleep problems, and more than 1 in 4 are at high risk for insomnia. Alcohol use has been linked to insomnia in adolescent, YA, and older adult populations, with bidirectional causal links between alcohol use and impaired sleep. Comorbidity of HED and sleep impairment is associated with increased consequences of alcohol use and exacerbates risk of accidents (including automobile accidents), impaired decision-making, and work and academic difficulties. Similar bidirectional relations exist with cannabis use and sleep, and co-use of these substances may be particularly harmful for sleep. Despite these risks, alcohol and cannabis prevention programs rarely target sleep directly, and the majority of YA sleep interventions either focus on sleep hygiene broadly in the absence of specific strategies to improve sleep or reduce alcohol/cannabis use, or have insufficient sample size and duration to truly evaluate impacts on sleep or related comorbid alcohol or cannabis use. Building on our successful R34 intervention development project, the current study addresses these gaps by evaluating efficacy of integrating a brief sleep intervention (BBTI) with an efficacious brief alcohol and cannabis intervention (BASICS/Cannabis BMI) to increase magnitude and duration of effects on sleep and alcohol and cannabis misuse among a diverse community sample of YA with comorbid insomnia, HED, and cannabis use. Given bidirectional influences between sleep impairment and alcohol/cannabis misuse leading to significant public health challenges for this population, an efficacious integrated treatment is imperative. Impact will be evaluated in a RCT comparing efficacy of telehealth-delivered, integrated BASICSSLEEP to BASICS/BMI only (BASICS+), BBTI only (SLEEP), and Attention control (AC). Surveys and daily diaries will assess alcohol, cannabis, and sleep at baseline, post-treatment, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-months. Specific aims are: (1) Evaluate comparative efficacy of BASICSSLEEP, BASICS+, and SLEEP in reducing alcohol/cannabis use and consequences and improving sleep; (2) Evaluate moderators of efficacy for integrated and monotherapies; and (3) Use diary data to evaluate temporal sequencing of effects and duration/decay over time. Findings will remedy important gaps in the literature and result in a scalable, accessible new resource to address this important and costly comorbidity.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
800
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participants must: 1) be 18-24 years old; 2) reside in Washington State; 3) have valid email address; 4) score on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) of 10 or higher, indicating at least a moderate score (score of 2 or more) on one or more of the first three items of the ISI measuring difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up too early; 5) report at least two heavy drinking episodes (4+ drinks for women /gender diverse, 5+ for men in a 2-hour period) in the past month; 6) have used cannabis 6+ times in the past month; and 7) did not participate in the R34 pilot feasibility trial on which the current RCT is based.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participants that don't meet inclusion criteria and/or failure to consent to further participation.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)Baseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item measure that assesses the severity of both nighttime and daytime aspects of insomnia. Response options utilized a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4 where "0" reflected low symptom endorsement and "4" reflected high symptom endorsement. Responses across the 7 items are summed to create a Total Score. Total Scores range from 0 to 28. Total scores of 0-7=No clinically significant insomnia, 8-14=subthreshold insomnia, 15-21=clinical insomnia (moderate severity), and 22-28=clinical insomnia (severe).

Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Short Form v1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment 8a (PROMIS SF8 v1.0 SRI)Baseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Short Form v1.0 Sleep Related Impairment 8a (8-items) assesses self-reported perceptions of impairment due to sleep problems. Response options range from 1=Not at all to 5=Very much and are summed to create a raw score (range 8-40). Raw scores are transformed to T-scores with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10, where higher scores indicate greater impairment due to sleep problems. For example, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average, whereas a T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use Index (QFP) peak itemBaseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Quantity Frequency Peak Alcohol Use Index was used to assess the peak number of standard drinks consumed on their heaviest drinking occasion over the previous month.

Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use Index (QFP) quantity itemBaseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Quantity Frequency Peak Alcohol Use Index was used to assess typical drinking quantity using the number of drinks consumed during a typical drinking occasion over the previous month.

Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use Index (QFP) frequency itemBaseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Quantity Frequency Peak Alcohol Use Index was used to assess the frequency of drinking over a typical week over the previous month. Response options range from 0=I do not drink at all to 7=Every day.

Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ)Baseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Daily Drinking Questionnaire assesses the typical number of drinks consumed on each day of a typical week over the previous month. Responses were summed to create a total score of overall number of standard drinks consumed over a typical week.

Rutgers Alcohol Problems IndexBaseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (23 items) assessed negative consequences related to drinking. Two items were added to assess driving after drinking 2 or more drinks and 4 or more drinks. Response options range from 0=Never to 4=More than 10 times. Responses were summed to create a total score of problems experienced in the previous 3 months. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Daily Marijuana QuestionnaireBaseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

The Daily Marijuana Questionnaire was used to assess hours high from cannabis use on each day over a typical week in the past month. Items were summed to create a total score of overall number of hours spent high during a typical week.

Marijuana-Related ConsequencesBaseline, Post-Intervention (7 weeks post-Baseline), 3 Month Follow-up (3 months post-Baseline), 6 Month Follow-up (6 months post-Baseline), 12 Month Follow-up (12 months post-Baseline), 18 Month Follow-up (18 months post-Baseline)

Marijuana Consequences were assessed with a 29-item measure assessing consequences related to marijuana use. Response options range from 0=Never to 4=More than 10 times. Scores are summed to create a total score of problems experienced in the previous 3 months. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 116.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath