MedPath

Open Label Study of Adalimumab in Subjects Who Have a Sub-optimal Response to Systemic Therapy or Phototherapy

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Psoriasis
Interventions
Biological: adalimumab
Registration Number
NCT00566722
Lead Sponsor
Abbott
Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of Humira (adalimumab) in patients who had a sub-optimal response to prior systemic therapy. This open-label study was conducted in a patient population of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis patients, which is an approved patient population for adalimumab.

Detailed Description

This 16-week multicenter, open-label study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a loading dose of 80 mg adalimumab, followed by 40 mg adalimumab every other week in the treatment of psoriasis in patients with a sub-optimal response to etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), or Narrow band Ultraviolet - B (NB-UVB).

Approximately 150 participants were planned for 3 sub-studies: 80 participants with sub-optimal response to etanercept, 40 participants with sub-optimal response to MTX, and 30 participants with sub-optimal response to NB-UVB. Actual enrollment was 82 participants with sub-optimal response to etanercept, 41 participants with sub-optimal response to MTX, and 29 participants with sub-optimal response to NB-UVB.

Screening was performed at least 96 hours and no more than 31 days before the Baseline visit (Week 0). A participant who was eligible for the study based on sub-optimal response to one treatment (MTX, NB-UVB, or etanercept) was required to discontinue that treatment within a specified time before first dose of adalimumab (see descriptions of sub-study groups). In addition, if the participant was also receiving another qualifying treatment, he/she was required to have discontinued the other treatment at least 30 days before the Baseline visit (Week 0).

Adalimumab was administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection. At the Baseline Visit (Week 0), all participants received an initial dose of 80 mg adalimumab SC. Every other week (odd-numbered weeks) from Week 1 to Week 15, participants received 40 mg adalimumab SC.

This was a single group assignment study, that is, all participants received the same treatment; however, data were summarized for 3 groups (sub-studies) that were defined by psoriasis treatments participants received before entering this study: methotrexate, etanercept, or narrow-band, ultraviolet-B.

Efficacy was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease severity, and patient-reported outcomes: Patient's Global Assessment (PTGA) of disease severity, the Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a visual analog scale (VAS) for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pain, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP).

Serious and nonserious adverse events were summarized by sub-study of participants (suboptimal response to MTX, suboptimal response to NB-UVB, and suboptimal response to etanercept).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
152
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis with disease duration of at least 6 months
  • Sub-optimal response to treatment with etanercept, methotrexate, or narrow-band UVB phototherapy
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior treatment with adalimumab
  • Multiple concomitant therapy restrictions and/or washouts (topicals, ultraviolet, other systemic psoriasis therapies)
  • Prior treatment with natalizumab
  • Concurrent active skin diseases/infections
  • Poorly controlled medical conditions
  • History of neurologic symptoms suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease
  • History of certain cancers
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Open Labeladalimumab-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Clear (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16Week 16

The PGA is a 6-point scale used to measure the severity of a patient's disease. Plaque elevation, scaling, and erythema are rated from 0= clear (no plaque elevation; no scaling; erythema=hyperpigmentation, pigmented macules, diffuse faint pink or red coloration) to 5=very severe (plaque elevation=very marked; scaling=very coarse; erythema=very severe \[extreme red coloration, dusky to deep red coloration\]).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Achieving a PGA of Clear (0) at Week 16Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving at Least 1 Grade of Improvement in PGA at Week 16 Compared to ScreeningFrom Screening to Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving 0 or 1 on Patient's Global Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Weeks 2, 4, and 8

The Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis-Severity is a rating of how well their disease is controlled. 0=complete disease control; 1=good disease control; 2=limited disease control; 3=uncontrolled disease.

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total ScoreFrom Screening to Week 4 and Week 16

The DLQI has 10 items and 6 subscales: symptoms and feelings (Q 1 and 2), daily activities (Q 3 and 4), leisure (Q 5 and 6), work and school (Q 7), personal relationships (Q 8 and 9), and treatment (Q 10). Participants rate how much their skin problem affected their life in previous week. Responses are 0 (not at all) to 3=very much. DLQI=total of scores for all items; max=30; min=0.

Number of Participants Achieving DLQI Total Score of 0 at Week 4 and Week 16Week 4 and Week 16

DLQI total score of 0 indicates psoriasis had no effect at all on participant's life.

Psoriasis-related Pruritus AssessmentFrom Screening to Week 16

The Psoriasis-related Pruritus Assessment is a scale for evaluating pruritus-related to psoriasis over the previous week; values range from 0 (no itching) to 10 (severe itching). A decrease in score indicates an improvement in pruritus.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Involving Psoriatic Plaques and/or Psoriatic ArthritisFrom Screening to Week 16

The participant rates his/her pain during the previous week on a 100 mm VAS, from 0=no pain to 100=pain as bad as it could be. A decrease in score indicates improvement.

Percent Work Time Missed Due to PsoriasisFrom Screening to Week 16

Work and activity impairment due to psoriasis were evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), a 6-item questionnaire that measures effect of psoriasis on number of hours worked and the number of hours missed from work. It also measures the effect on productivity and regular activities: 0=no effect on work/daily activities; 10=psoriasis prevented me from working/doing daily activities. Decreases in values on each part indicate improvement. At Screening, percent time missed in the previous week ranged from 0% to 40%.

Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to PsoriasisFrom Screening to Week 16

Percent overall work impairment was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) (described above). At Screening, overall impairment ranged from 0% to 94%. A decrease in percent overall work impairment indicates improvement.

Percent Impairment While Working Due to PsoriasisFrom Screening to Week 16

Percent impairment while working was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), described above. At Screening, impairment while working ranged from 0% to 90%. A decrease in percent impairment indicates improvement.

Percent Activity Impairment Due to PsoriasisFrom Screening to Week 16

Percent impairment in regular activities was evaluated using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP), described above. At Screening, activity impairment due to psoriasis ranged from 0% to 90%.

Sleep Problems Index IIFrom Screening to Week 16

Sleep Problems Index of the Sleep Scale from the Medical Outcomes Study reflects sleep disturbance, perceived sleep adequacy, daytime somnolence, and awakening short of breath or with headache. Participant rates each item from "none of the time" to "all of the time" for the previous 4 weeks. Scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale; lower scores indicate less impairment. Decrease in score indicates improvement.

Trial Locations

Locations (25)

Siena Medical Research

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Eastern Canada Cutaneous Research Associates

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Stratica Medical

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Centre de Rescherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Kirk Barber Research

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Peachtree Dermatology Associates

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Dermatology Research of Arkansas

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Dermatology Treatment & Research Center, PA Research

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Dallas, Texas, United States

Florida Academic Dermatology Centers

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Miami, Florida, United States

ORA Clinical Research and Development

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Andover, Massachusetts, United States

New York University School of Medicine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

New York, New York, United States

Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Centers

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Therapeutics Clinical Research

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

San Diego, California, United States

Center for Clinical Studies

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Houston, Texas, United States

Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Baylor Research Institute

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Dallas, Texas, United States

Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

New York, New York, United States

Clinical Partners

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Johnston, Rhode Island, United States

Dermatrials Research

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

K.Papp Clinical Research Inc

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Montifiore Medical Center

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Bronx, New York, United States

Paddington Testing Co.

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Dermatology Associates

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Seattle, Washington, United States

Radiant Research

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath