Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial
- Conditions
- Complication of Surgical ProcedureLeak; Blood
- Interventions
- Procedure: Bariatric surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT01459471
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Brief Summary
The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of post-operative complications. Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated.
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study was to prospectively and randomly compare three different techniques of SLR during LSG: oversewing (group A), buttressed transection with a polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (group B) and staple-line roofing with a gelatin fibrin matrix (group C).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- Morbidly obese patients waiting for sleeve gastrectomy
- BMI<35 Kg/m2,
- Important comorbidities
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description bleeding, leak, operative time Bariatric surgery -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method safety of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by measuring the number of adverse effects, i.e. bleeding and leaks. six months a comparison between three techniques of staple line reinforcement. The number of adverse events will be registered and analyzed
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method