MedPath

Staple-line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Three Different Techniques: a Randomized Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Complication of Surgical Procedure
Leak; Blood
Interventions
Procedure: Bariatric surgery
Registration Number
NCT01459471
Lead Sponsor
University of Rome Tor Vergata
Brief Summary

The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of post-operative complications. Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study was to prospectively and randomly compare three different techniques of SLR during LSG: oversewing (group A), buttressed transection with a polyglycolide acid and trimethylene carbonate (group B) and staple-line roofing with a gelatin fibrin matrix (group C).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Morbidly obese patients waiting for sleeve gastrectomy
Exclusion Criteria
  • BMI<35 Kg/m2,
  • Important comorbidities

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
bleeding, leak, operative timeBariatric surgery-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
safety of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by measuring the number of adverse effects, i.e. bleeding and leaks.six months

a comparison between three techniques of staple line reinforcement. The number of adverse events will be registered and analyzed

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath