MedPath

Neuramis® Volume Lidocaine for Volume Augmentation in the Mid-Face

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Mid Face Volume Loss
Interventions
Device: experimental
Drug: comparator
Registration Number
NCT03754413
Lead Sponsor
Medy-Tox
Brief Summary

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Neuramis® Volume Lidocaine for volume augmentation in the mid-face.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, "no-treatment" controlled study conducted in normal, healthy subjects. This study is anticipated to enroll approximately 236 male and/or female subjects between the ages of 20 to 75 years, inclusive, who desire volume augmentation to correct deficit in their mid-face volume.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
236
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Male or female 20 to 75 years of age
  2. Subjects who desire volume augmentation to correct deficit in the mid-face volume that is rated as Grade 3, 4, or 5 on the Facial Volume Scale
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subjects who have received anti coagulation, anti-platelet, or thrombolytic medications, anti-inflammatory drugs.
  2. Subjects who have undergone facial plastic surgery in the face area below the level of the lower orbital rim, tissue grafting, or tissue augmentation with silicone, fat, or other permanent, or semi-permanent dermal fillers or are planning to undergo any of these procedures at any time during the clinical investigation.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Investigational medical deviceexperimentalNeuramis® Volume Lidocaine
Comparator devicecomparatorNo-treatment
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total Facial Volume Scale(FVS) improvement rate at Week 24Week 24

Facial Volume Scale score ranges from 0-5 with higher score indicating increasing severity of mid-face volume deficit / Proportion of subjects with Facial Volume Scale(FVS) showing ≥1-point improvement (Facial Volume Scale decrease ≥1) at Week 24 compared to Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
6-point Facial Volume Scale(FVS) improvement rate at Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 52

The proportion of subjects with 6-point Facial Volume Scale(FVS) decrease ≥1 from Baseline as assessed at Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 52.

Change in 6-point Facial Volume Scale(FVS) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Change in 6-point Facial Volume Scale(FVS) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) improvement rate at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) improvement rate is defined as the proportion of subjects with GAIS score ≤3

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Beijing Hopsital

🇨🇳

Beijing, China

Beijing Hopsital
🇨🇳Beijing, China

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.