跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/03/063888
CTRI/2024/03/063888尚未招募1 期

A prospective randomized comparative study of TAScope Vs Kingvision in ease of intubation and haemodynamic changes

Department of anesthesia1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 86 人开始时间: 2024年3月23日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
86
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number of attempts.

研究概览

简要总结

Airway management is the assessment, planning and series of medical procedures required to maintain or restore an individual’s ventilation or oxygenation.

A difficult airway is a situation in which a healthcare provider who can manage airway encounters difficulty with standard methods of airway management. Its definition is not standardised as there are some variations between national expert guidelines. The American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) defines a difficult airway as existing when “a conventionally trained anaesthesiologist experiences difficulty with facemask ventilation of the upper airway, difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both.” King Vision is a light weighted portable, selfcontained, battery operated video laryngoscope which is also water resistant. It has disposable blade which has a channel for Endotracheal tube insertion. It also has an anti-fogging mechanism.

TAScope (The Anaesthetist Society scope) is a video laryngoscope which aids in passing the tube in difficult airways. It utilizes boroscope camera(5.5 mm diameter HD camera) connectable to any laptop or even compatible mobiles or tablet, which becomes the screen for intubation. It also has a channel facilitating the insertion of bougie, on which endotracheal tube is railroaded over it under vision. It is useful for patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients posted for elective surgery with ASA grade 1 and 2, age between 20 to 65 years, all mallampati grades will be included in this study.

排除标准

  • Patients with anticipated difficult airway or having any pathology of oral cavity which may obstruct insertion of device will be excluded from study.

结局指标

主要结局

Number of attempts.

时间窗: 1 year

2. Time for successful intubation.

时间窗: 1 year

3. Laryngoscopic view – POGO score(percentage of glottic opening)

时间窗: 1 year

4. Haemodynamic changes

时间窗: 1 year

次要结局

  • Airway trauma.(Post operative complications such as hoarseness of voice and sore throa)

研究者

申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Asma Rahat

Rohilkhand medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

comparative study of TAScope Vs Kingvision in ease... | 临床试验