Effectiveness of two sedative drugs on pediatric patients during dental treatment
- Conditions
- Sedation of pediatric patients during dental treatmentOral Health
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN13661311
- Lead Sponsor
- King Saud University
- Brief Summary
2022 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35204863/ Post-discharge effects and parents' opinions (added 15/07/2022)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 32
1. 3 - 6 years old
2. ASA I
3. Frankl behaviour rating scale 1 or 2
4. Mallampati score I or II
5. Brodsky tonsillar size scoring 0 or 1 or 2
6. Children within the normal range of weight
7. Children who needed two sedation visits for completion of dental treatment
8. Children who needed a comparable dental treatment (as regards restorations, pulp treatment, crowns, extraction) on both sides of the same jaw.
1. Children with learning difficulties or mental disabilities
2. Children with active upper respiratory tract infection, any history of a recent cough or cold (less than 2 weeks)
3. Children with a known allergy or hypersensitive reaction to either midazolam or fentanyl
4. Children at risk of airway obstruction
5. Children with any intranasal pathology or congenital anomaly
6. Children with a previous history of moderate sedation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. The sedation scores were recorded using the Modified Observer’s Alertness/ Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) after sedation at each visit<br>2. The behavior scores were recorded using a four-point scale (4 = combative, disoriented, or excited; 3 = moderately agitated; 2 = not calm; and 1 = calm) after sedation at each visit<br>3. Post-discharge adverse effects and parental satisfaction and preference were evaluated using a questionnaire 24 hours after each visit
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. The onset of sedation was measured as the minimum time interval required for child to become drowsy after administering the oral midazolam at each visit<br>2. The time that elapses between the child becoming drowsy (sedation score = 4) and when the patient become alert and awake (sedation score = 5 or 6) was measured as the working time at each visit