comparison of the efficacy between tissue adhesive and standard suturing for flap closure after impacted mandibular third molar odontectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- comparison between the efficacy between the tissue adhesive and standard suturing
研究概览
简要总结
Impaction of mandibular third molar is one of the common problem in dentistry.. It’s prevalence is about 16.7-68.6%. In my study i would evaluate the efficacy of cyanoacrylate glue which can be used for wound closure. Aim of the study is to compare the efficacy between tissue adhesive and standard suturing following the impacted mandibular third molar odontectomy for flap closure. In this prospective blinded study I will include 100 healthy consented individuals of age group 18-40 years who are indicated to undergo surgical removal of mandibular third molar under local anaesthesia . The patients are divided into 2 groups , each consisting of 50 patients . In group 1 , individuals are given conventional suturing after mandibular third molar removal. In group 2, individuals who are given cyanoacrylate glue after mandibular third molar removal. All patients will be undergoing routine hemogram before the procedure . They will be prepared in standard manner and taken up under proper aseptic condition.. Following the procedure by adequate curettage , debridement and thorough irrigation and the flap will be closed with cyanoacrylate glue in group 1 where as vicryl 3-0 sutures used in group 2. They will be given a long acting anesthetic post operatively. Patients will be prescribed similar analgesics for 3 days and antibiotic for 5 days postoperatively. Postoperative bleeding , pain, wound dehiscence and wound healing are evaluated on the 1st 3rd 7th and 15th day postoperatively.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Open Label
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 40.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Impacted mandibular third molar with complete flap coverage no history of pericoronitis and previous infection patients with adequate mouth opening.
排除标准
- •chronic smokers allergic to drugs or anesthetic agents poor oral hygiene patients lost to follow up patients under oral contraceptives patients under radiotherapy or chemotherapy diabetic patients patients on immunosuppressants.
结局指标
主要结局
comparison between the efficacy between the tissue adhesive and standard suturing
时间窗: 2 years
次要结局
- comparison of postoperative bleeding, pain, wound dehiscence and wound healing(2 years)
