Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03435159
NCT03435159
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison the Effects of Manual and Instrumental Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation on Vertebrobasilar and Internal Carotis Arteries in Healthy Population

Bahçeşehir University1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentFebruary 17, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Vertebral Artery Dissection, Traumatic
Sponsor
Bahçeşehir University
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

After lumbar pain, neck pain is the most common cause of patients needing chiropractic care; the second most common cause of spinal manipulation use (1). Manipulation and mobilization are commonly used by chiropractors, osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists in the treatment of neck pain. Many studies show that the Activator instrument is also used for this purpose in the chiropractic profession (2) There are several published case reports that relate to neck manipulation to vertebral artery dissection and stroke. The prevailing theory is that the neck extension and / or rotation may damage the vertebral artery in the foramen transversarium, especially at the C1-C2 level (2). However, most cases of extracranial vertebral artery dissection are thought to be spontaneous (3).

In the literature, there have been no studies investigating the effects of instrument-assisted spinal manipulation on vertebrobasilar and internal carotis arteries. the aim of this study to compare the effect of manual and instrumental spinal manipulation on blood flow parameters of vertebrobasilar and internal carotis arteries on healthy persons which have mechanical neck pain and asymptomatic in vertebrobasilar insufficiency test.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 17, 2017
End Date
April 28, 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Bahçeşehir University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Burcu Özdemir Kocabey

PhD student, Physical Therapist

Bahçeşehir University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Being between 20-40 years of age
  • Having non-specific mechanical neck pain for more than 3 months with symptoms provoked by neck postures, movements, or palpation
  • Willingly participating to the study
  • Signing the confirmation form.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Spinal root compression (radiculopathy)
  • Neurological symptoms like weakness and numbness in extremities and face, uncontrolled movements, abnormal gait, dizziness, undefined nausea/vomiting, swallowing and speaking difficulties
  • Acute inflammatory disease
  • Spontaneously vertebral artery dissection in family
  • Tested positive in premanipulative vertebrobasilar artery insufficiency test
  • Being on anticoagulant and antiaggregant medication.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV)

Time Frame: 1 minute

cm/s, measured in each group

Change in End Diastolic Velocity (EDV)

Time Frame: 1 minute

cm/s, measured in each group

Change in Resistive Index (RI)

Time Frame: 1 minute

The Formula: RI = (PSV- EDV) / PSV, it has no unit, measured in each group

Change in Volume Flow (VF)

Time Frame: 1 minute

ml/min, measured only for right and left vertebral arteries

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials