Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04265417
NCT04265417
Completed
N/A

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Robotic Assisted Rectal Cancer Resection Alone vs. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Taiyuan Li0 sites98 target enrollmentJanuary 6, 2015

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Rectal Neoplasms
Sponsor
Taiyuan Li
Enrollment
98
Primary Endpoint
Overall survival
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery for patients with rectal cancer. However, it's safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone vs. robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to discuss aforementioned question.

Detailed Description

Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery for patients with rectal cancer. However, it's safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone vs. robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to discuss aforementioned question. From January 2015 to November 2016, a consecutive wave of 49 patients underwent robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction and 49 matched patients underwent conventional robotic assisted rectal cancer resection were systematically analyzed in this study.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 6, 2015
End Date
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Taiyuan Li
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Taiyuan Li

Prof., Chief physician, Head of The Fifth Department of General Surgery

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • T stage 1-3;
  • aged between 18 to 75;
  • the tumor margin is at least 4 cm from the anus;
  • body mass index ≤30kg/m2;
  • no distant metastases; (6)tumor size≤5cm.

Exclusion Criteria

  • emergency surgery for intestinal obstruction or massive bleeding;
  • history of abdominal or pelvic surgery.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall survival

Time Frame: Up to 36 months

To determine the survival differences between NOSE group and RARC group. Overall survival is defined as the time from surgery to death from any causes

Disease-free survival

Time Frame: Up to 36 months

To determine the survival differences between NOSE group and RARC group. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from surgery to local or distant recurrence

Secondary Outcomes

  • Operation time(1 day)
  • Estimated intraoperative blood loss(1 day)
  • Postoperative hospital stay(30 days)
  • Postoperative visual analogue scale scale on day 1(1 day)
  • Time to pass flatus(30 days)
  • Hospitalization costs(30 day)
  • Specimen length(30 day)
  • Proximal margin(30 day)
  • Distal margin(30 days)
  • Postoperative white blood cell count(30 days)
  • Postoperative procalcitonin(30 days)
  • Histological differentiation(30 days)
  • Number of lymph nodes harvested(30 days)
  • Postoperative C-reactive protein(30 days)

Similar Trials