Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/2024-516319-25-00
2024-516319-25-00
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2

Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging for Pre-operative Lymph Node Assessment in Intermediate and High-risk Nonmetastasic Prostate Cancer

Centre Hospitalier Regional Et Universitaire De Brest1 site in 1 country159 target enrollmentNovember 26, 2024

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Regional Et Universitaire De Brest
Enrollment
159
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of PET-PSMA for the detection of lymph node metastases in intermediate- or high-risk prostatic neoplasia in patients whose radical treatment by prostatectomy is selected by the multidisciplinary consultation meeting, by reference to the gold standard (reference test) obtained from histological data and/or imaging follow-up.
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

To determine the diagnostic performance of Positron Emission Tomography with Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands (PET-PSMA) for the detection of lymph node metastases in intermediate or high-risk prostatic neoplasia for which radical treatment by prostatectomy is selected by the multidisciplinary consultation meeting

Registry
euclinicaltrials.eu
Start Date
November 26, 2024
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Pr Philippe ROBIN

Scientific

Centre Hospitalier Regional Et Universitaire De Brest

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Histologically confirmed prostatic neoplasia
  • Intermediate-risk neoplasia (PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL and/or TR showing T2b and/or ISUP 2 or 3, AND with risk of lymph node extension > 5% according to the Briganti nomogram) or high-risk neoplasia (PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or TR ≥ T2c and/or ISUP 4 or 5) according to the d'Amico classification
  • Radical treatment by total prostatectomy selected by the multidisciplinary consultation meeting
  • Patient affiliated to or benefiting from a health insurance scheme.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Refusal or inability to take part in the study
  • Prostatic neoplasia with low risk of extension according to the Amico classification, or intermediate risk but with a risk of lymph node extension <5% according to the Briganti nomogram
  • Curative treatment other than surgery selected
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • Karnofsky score < 70 or ECOG score > 2
  • Patient under guardianship or trusteeship

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of PET-PSMA for the detection of lymph node metastases in intermediate- or high-risk prostatic neoplasia in patients whose radical treatment by prostatectomy is selected by the multidisciplinary consultation meeting, by reference to the gold standard (reference test) obtained from histological data and/or imaging follow-up.

To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of PET-PSMA for the detection of lymph node metastases in intermediate- or high-risk prostatic neoplasia in patients whose radical treatment by prostatectomy is selected by the multidisciplinary consultation meeting, by reference to the gold standard (reference test) obtained from histological data and/or imaging follow-up.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Modification of the surgical strategy for lymph node dissection on the basis of the PET-PSMA examination, compared with the strategy that would have been dictated by conventional imaging alone.
  • Existence of a pathological focus according to each of the 3 examinations (PET-PSMA, MRI and anatomopathology = gold standard) for each of the 6 following locations: base, middle, prostatic apex (right and left)
  • Positive predictive value of PET-PSMA in the detection of distant visceral or bone metastases, taking as the gold standard the diagnosis made by a review committee in the light of the patient's follow-up and the results available in current practice (clinical data, anatomopathology, repeated PSA tests and imaging).
  • Adverses events recorded during the assessment

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials