A retrospective comparison of two types of dialysis machine for dialysis patients
- Conditions
- End stage renal disease (Hemodialysis patients)Urological and Genital DiseasesRenal disease
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN12403265
- Lead Sponsor
- Renal Therapy Services
- Brief Summary
2022 Results article in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100431 medium cutoff (MCO) versus high-flux (HF) dialysis membranes results (added 23/02/2022)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1098
1. End stage renal disease
2. Prevalent HD patient defined as having received HD for 90 days or more at the time of the cohort’s inception (01 September 2017 through 30 November 2017)
3. Enrolled in the COREXH registry between 01 September 2017 and 30 November 2017, or were treated via conventional high-flux HD during the same time period at the same renal centers, and with the same model of dialysis care
4. Undergoing HD at least 3 times per week and a minimum duration of 4 hours per session
5. Received dialysis treatment in a renal clinic that meets water quality standards established by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)
1. High comorbidity measured as Charlson comorbidity Index > 8 and patients who were not expected to survive 6 months
2. Metastatic disease
3. Pregnancy
4. Younger than 18 years old
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <br> Measured using patient records at 2 year follow up:<br> 1. Hospitalization events<br> 2. Days spent in hospital<br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <br> Measured using patient records at 2 year follow up:<br> 1. Mortality<br> 2. Medication consumption<br>