Comparison of Innovative Rehabilitation Treatments and Examination of Their Effectiveness in Stroke Patients
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Other: RobotOther: EXE+ROBOther: FizioOther: EXE2Other: EXE1
- Registration Number
- NCT05985889
- Lead Sponsor
- Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital
- Brief Summary
We perform a comparison of several groups. We would like to determine how robotic and virtual therapy is most effective in the treatment of stroke patients. We place great emphasis on walking speed, quality of life, coordination and changes in walking distance.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
Inclusion Criteria
post stroke 6MWT : 120> minimum after stroke 3 days be a stroke patient first stroke hemiplegia
Exclusion Criteria
multiple strokes, inability to stand and walk, cognitive function disorder does not reach 50 meters with a minimal walking aid Alcohol Sever heart problem sever demeanor alcoholism drug problems Drug
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Robotic Robot They performed training with a robot 15 times over 3 weeks. EXE+ROB EXE+ROB Virtual and robotic treatments are performed once a day. Fizio Fizio They receive physiotherapy treatment. EXE2 EXE2 Virtual reality treatment is performed twice a day. EXE1 EXE1 Virtual reality treatment is performed once a day.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method mRS score 3 weeks (0-5 score, high score better)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 6MWT 3 weeks meter
Berg balance score 3 weeks (0-30, high score better) 10m gait speed 3 weeks m/s
Barthel index score 3 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dr. Tollár József
🇭🇺Kaposvár, Somogy, Hungary