跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05548894
NCT05548894已完成不适用

Comparison Between the Efficacy of Stabilization Splint and Low Level Laser Therapy for Treatment of Patients With Chronic Closed Lock of the Non-reducible Temporo-mandibular Joint Disc. A Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mansoura University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 42 人开始时间: 2021年3月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
42
试验地点
1
主要终点
evaluation of mouth opening

研究概览

简要总结

Stabilization splint therapy and Low-level laser therapy may serve as non-invasive intervention for painful temporomandibular disorders, but its efficacy is still debated. This study compared the effect of stabilization splint and low-level laser therapy alone or in combination in patients with painful chronic closed lock of temporomandibular joints disc displacement without Reduction 42 patients diagnosed with chronic closed lock of disc displacement without reduction were allocated equally and randomly into three treatment groups: group I received combined stabilization splint and low- level laser therapy, group II received low - level laser therapy and group III received stabilization splint. They were evaluated at baseline and one week, two weeks, four weeks, three months, and six months after the intervention.

详细描述

Objectives: Stabilization splint therapy and low- level laser therapy may serve as non-invasive intervention for painful temporomandibular disorders, but its efficacy is still debated. This study compared the effect of stabilization splint and low- level laser therapy alone or in combination in patients with painful chronic closed lock of temporomandibular joints disc displacement without Reduction.

Patients and methods: 42 patients diagnosed with chronic closed lock of disc displacement without reduction were allocated equally and randomly into three treatment groups: group I received combined stabilization splint and low-level laser therapy, group II received low-level laser therapy and group III received stabilization splint. They were evaluated at baseline and one week, two weeks, four weeks, three months, and six months after the intervention. Time of being normal was also evaluated.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 55 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Clinical diagnosis of chronic closed lock patients
  • Must not be able to open their mouth

排除标准

  • neurologic diseases
  • TMJ pathologic lesions

结局指标

主要结局

evaluation of mouth opening

时间窗: 6 months

improvement in mouth opening or not

temporomandibular joint palpation

时间窗: 6 months

joint pain was achieved by first palpating the temporomandibular joint lateral pole by placing the index finger with firm and constant pressure of half kg lasted two seconds over the condyle in front of the tragus

Masticatory muscles palpation

时间窗: 6 months

the masticatory muscles were palpated bilaterally with firm and constant pressure of one kg lasted two seconds to define painful areas

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison Between Splint and Laser in Patients... | 临床试验