MedPath

Whole Genome Sequencing (ChromoSeq) as an Adjunct to Conventional Genomic Profiling in MDS

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Whole Genome Sequencing
Interventions
Device: ChromoSeq
Registration Number
NCT05434598
Lead Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Brief Summary

This is a single institution, prospective study of the whole genome sequencing assay, ChromoSeq. Using prospectively collected patient data, coupled with physician surveys, the investigators seek to determine the feasibility of implementing ChromoSeq in addition to standard genomic testing, for patients with the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients: ChromSeqChromoSeqChromoSeq will be performed on bone marrow or peripheral blood DNA from consented patients in parallel with the standard of care cytogenetics, FISH, and the MyeloSeq gene panel obtained from that sample, in a CLIA licensed environment using CLIA-compliant ChromoSeq procedures.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of failed ChromoSeq assaysThrough completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)

* As compared to failed standard of care genomic profiling assays

* The proportion of first-run failures for ChromoSeq assays will be compared to the proportion of failed standard of care genomic profiling assays using a directional Fisher's exact test.

Rate of assay success on first attempt between ChromoSeq and conventional cytogenetics as measured by total number of recurrent structural variants identifiedThrough completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)

-The number of recurrent structural variants detected by ChromoSeq will be compared to those detected by conventional cytogenetics using two non-inferiority tests for dependent samples using non-inferiority margin of 1%.

Rate of assay success on first attempt between ChromoSeq and conventional cytogenetics as measured by total number of copy number alterations identifiedThrough completion of all ChromoSeq tests (estimated to be 24 months)

The number of copy number alterations detected by ChromoSeq will be compared to those detected by conventional cytogenetics using two non-inferiority tests for dependent samples using non-inferiority margin of 1%.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stakeholder perceptions of ChromoSeqThrough 1 month after generation of ChromoSeq for all patients enrolled (estimated to be 25 months)

* Using survey responses from treating physicians obtained from per case standardized questionnaires designed using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs

* For each case, the corresponding treating physician will be asked to answer a case-based ChromoSeq Implementation Physician Survey. In order to prospectively investigate how the ChromoSeq data was used or could be used by the treating physician for each case, and to evaluate perceptions in real time, the physician will be asked to complete the survey within 1 month of the ChromoSeq and completed conventional genomic profiling results being returned to the chart, whichever is later.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Washington University School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath