SUrgical Versus PERcutaneous AXillary Artery International Registry
- Conditions
- Surgical and the Percutaneous Approach to the Upper Extremity Access
- Interventions
- Other: access axillary or brachial artery
- Registration Number
- NCT04589962
- Lead Sponsor
- IRCCS San Raffaele
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the Study is to compare the outcomes of the surgical and the percutaneous approach to the upper extremity access (axillary or brachial artery) during endovascular procedures on the aortic valve, the aorta, and its side branches.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 700
- Patients who received a surgical or percutaneous access to the axillary or brachial artery during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), Fenestrated/Branched-Endovascular Aortic Repair (F/BEVAR), chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR) or visceral side branches stenting, between January 2010 and May 2020
- Adult patients ≥18 years
- Introducer sheath internal diameter (ID) used < 5F or > 22F
- Patient with previous surgical axillary access on the puncture side (Pacemaker excluded)
- Patient with subclavian / axillary / brachial occlusive disease with stenosis greater than 50%
- Patient with previous bypass surgery or stent placement in the vicinity of access site (ie. Axillary extracorporeal cannulation with, axillo-femoral bypass, patch (venous or synthetic repair of previous axillary access, etc)
- Bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- Patients with active systemic or cutaneous infection or inflammation
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- Patient younger than 18 years of age
- Patients who are morbidity obese (BMI > 40 Kg/m2)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Percutaneous Group access axillary or brachial artery - Surgical Group access axillary or brachial artery -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Durability of vessel closure 30 days freedom from secondary intervention at access site
optimal hemostasis 30 days Closure success rate of the procedure without any adjunctive procedures
vascular complications 30 days freedom from major access vascular complications requiring adjunctive endovascular or open procedures
Incidence of permanent peripheral nerve injury 30 days freedom from permanent peripheral nerve injury with functional compromise
stroke Incidence periprocedural freedom from periprocedural stroke
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (18)
UniversitätsSpital Zürich
🇨🇭Zürich, Switzerland
Ascension St John Hospital and Medical Center
🇺🇸Detroit, Michigan, United States
San Filippo Neri Hospital
🇮🇹Roma, Italy
S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital
🇮🇹Perugia, Italy
Medical University of Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Service de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardiovasculaire
🇫🇷Rennes, France
Imelda Hospital
🇧🇪Bonheiden, Belgium
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Skåne University Hospital
🇸🇪Malmö, Sweden
University hospital Leipzig
🇩🇪Leipzig, Germany
IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
IRCCS San Raffaele
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
Nuffield Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford
🇬🇧Oxford, United Kingdom
University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
🇪🇸Vigo, Spain
University Hospital of Cologne
🇩🇪Cologne, Germany